Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36852286›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2023

The use of technology to support lifestyle interventions in knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review.

David F Hamilton, Shehnaz Akhtar, Benjamin Griffiths, Yeliz Prior, Richard K Jones

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06289218 (Kinesio Taping Versus Interferential Current Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06289218 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Kinesio Taping Versus Interferential Current Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: a Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled63ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsinterferential current, kinesio taping, exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David F HamiltonResearch Centre for Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Shehnaz AkhtarSchool of Health and Society, Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Benjamin GriffithsSchool of Health and Society, Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Yeliz PriorSchool of Health and Society, Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Richard K JonesSchool of Health and Society, Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
University of Salford · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Technological tools that promote the adoption of physical activity to increase individuals' functional ability in knee osteoarthritis (OA) are desired to support lifestyle interventions. However, there is little consensus as to the current use of such supportive interventions for knee OA. The aim of this scoping review is therefore to provide an overview on the current use of technology within lifestyle interventions for individuals with knee OA. Methods: Scoping review as per PRISMA guidance. Structured search of Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, ELSEVIER, IEEExplore, GOOGLE Scholar, MEDLINE, PEDRO, PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE from 2010 to 2020 inclusive. Hits were screened by title and abstract and then full text review based on pre-defined criteria. Results were synthesised and pooled by theme for reporting. Results: 2508 papers were identified, and following review, 78 studies included. Papers included interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (n ​= ​31), total or partial knee arthroplasty (n ​= ​20) and developmental work in healthy controls (n ​= ​27). Of the 78 studies, 47 were carried out in laboratory settings and 31 in the field. The identified themes included Movement measurement (n ​= ​24), Tele-rehabilitation (n ​= ​22), Biofeedback (n ​= ​20), Directly applied interventions (n ​= ​3), Virtual or augmented reality (n ​= ​5) and Machine learning (n ​= ​4). Conclusions: The predominant current use of technology in OA lifestyle interventions is through well-established telecommunication and commercially available activity, joint angle and loading based measurement devices, while integrating new advanced technologies seems a longer-term goal. There is great potential for the engineering and clinical community to use technology to develop systems that offer real-time feedback to patients and clinician as part of rehabilitative interventions to inform treatment.

Indexed as

KneeLifestyle interventionsOsteoarthritisTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36852286
PMCPMC9958490
OpenAlexW4319764676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.