Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36852111›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Improving the rate of inferior vena cava filter retrieval through multidisciplinary engagement.

Hannah Stevens, Hadley Bortz, Sharon Chao, Radha Ramanan, Warren Clements, Karlheinz Peter, James D McFadyen, Huyen Tran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Utilization and Outcomes of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Use.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah StevensDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hadley BortzDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharon ChaoDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Radha RamananDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Warren ClementsDepartment of Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Karlheinz PeterAtherothrombosis and Vascular Biology Program, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James D McFadyenDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Huyen TranDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AUAustralian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research · AUBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUMonash University · AUNational Trauma Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The placement of retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters occurs commonly, but retrieval rates remain low. Consequently, there is an unmet clinical need to ensure appropriate follow-up and retrieval of these devices. Objectives: To determine the association between an IVC filter surveillance team with filter retrievals or a documented filter plan, time to retrieval, and incidence of filter complications or recurrent venous thromboembolism. Methods: Ambidirectional cohort study evaluating consecutive IVC filter insertions before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary surveillance team (MDST). We report an odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs, adjusted by age, sex, weight, and malignancy status. Results: Overall, 453 patients were included, with 272 individuals in the pre-MDST cohort and 181 individuals in the post-MDST cohort. The MDST was associated with a higher composite primary outcome of IVC filter retrieval or a documented filter plan from 79.4% in the pre-MDST cohort to 96.1% in the post-MDST cohort (OR, 6.44; 95% CI, 3.06-15.84) Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the importance of a structured program to ensure timely IVC filter retrieval and ultimately improve patient care.

Indexed as

cohort studypatient carevena cava filtersvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36852111
PMCPMC9958400
OpenAlexW4313626979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.