Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36852077›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Efficacy and safety of pharmacologic therapies for prevention of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women.

Fei-Long Wei, Quan-You Gao, Kai-Long Zhu, Wei Heng, Ming-Rui Du, Fan Yang, Hao-Ran Gao, Tian Li, Ji-Xian Qian, Cheng-Pei Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow.Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fei-Long WeiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Quan-You GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Kai-Long ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Wei HengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Ming-Rui DuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Hao-Ran GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Tian LiSchool of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, 710032 Xi'an, China.
Ji-Xian QianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Cheng-Pei ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 710038, Xi'an, China.
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are many pharmaceutical interventions available to prevent osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women, but the efficacy and safety of these drugs are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drugs in the prevention of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 15, 2020, including postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Network meta-analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to report the results. This study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020201167. Main Outcomes were incidences of new vertebral fracture and serious adverse events. Results: Fifty-five RCTs (n = 104 580) evaluating vertebral fractures of sixteen kinds of pharmacologic therapies were included in the network meta-analysis. Abaloparatide (RR, 0.21; [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.51]), alendronate (RR, 0.55; [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.81]), calcitonin (RR, 0.44; [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78]), denosumab (RR, 0.33; [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.61]), parathyroid hormone (PTH) (RR, 0.32; [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.97]), risedronate (RR, 0.65; [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.00]), romosozumab (RR, 0.31; [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.61]), strontium ranelate (RR, 0.62; [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.93]), teriparatide (RR, 0.27; [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.43]), and zoledronate (RR, 0.41; [95% CI, 0.93]) were associated with lower vertebral fracture risk compared to placebo. PTH was associated with more adverse event rates. For any two drug treatments, the RR of serious adverse events was not statistically significant. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and calcitonin may be slower to work because they have only been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fractures in long-term (>18 months) follow-up. Conclusions: A variety of drugs are safe and effective in preventing osteoporotic vertebral fractures. HRT and calcitonin only reduced the risk of vertebral fractures during a follow-up of 21-72 months.

Indexed as

Pharmacologic therapyPostmenopausal osteoporosisSafetyVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID36852077
PMCPMC9958453
OpenAlexW4310816108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.