Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851980›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2023

Automating mosquito taxonomy by compressing and enhancing a feature fused EfficientNet with knowledge distillation and a novel residual skip block.

Francis Jesmar P Montalbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Identifying disease vector images in the Americas in the age of artificial intelligence.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Francis Jesmar P MontalboCollege of Informatics and Computing Sciences, Batangas State University, Batangas City, Batangas, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying lethal vector and non-vector mosquitoes can become difficult for a layperson and sometimes even for experts, considering their visual similarities. Recently, deep learning (DL) became a solution to assist in differentiating the two mosquito types to reduce infections and enhance actions against them. However, the existing methods employed to develop a DL model for such a task tend to require massive amounts of computing resources and steps, making them impractical. Based on existing methods, most researchers rely on training pre-trained state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), which usually require about a million parameters to train. Hence, this method proposes an approach to craft a model with a far lower computing cost while attaining similar or even significantly better performance than pre-existing models in automating the taxonomy of several mosquitoes. This method combines the approach of layer-wise compression and feature fusion with enhanced residual learning that consists of a self-normalizing activation and depthwise convolutions.•The proposed method yielded a model that outperformed the most recent and classic state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network models.•With the help of the modified residual block and knowledge distillation, the proposed method significantly reduced a fused model's cost while maintaining competitive performance.•Unlike other methods, the proposed method had the best performance-to-cost ratio.

Indexed as

Compression and Enhancement of an Automated Deep Learning model for Mosquito TaxonomyConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep learningEfficientnetEntomologyFeature FusionFine-TuningResidual LearningTransfer Learning

Identifiers

PMID36851980
PMCPMC9958064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.