Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851975›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2023

A New Scoring System for Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Ling Sun, Bing Han, Yu Wang, Wenwu Zhu, Jianguang Jiang, Ailin Zou, Boyu Chi, Lipeng Mao, Yuan Ji, Qingjie Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ling Sun *Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Bing Han *Department of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221009, People's Republic of China.
Yu Wang *Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Wenwu ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221009, People's Republic of China.
Jianguang JiangDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Ailin ZouDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Boyu ChiDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Lipeng MaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Yuan JiDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.
Qingjie WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-8128
Liming TangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Disease, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In this study, a risk score for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) were evaluated for predicting the risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Methods: Patients with AMI were divided into two sets according to whether VA occurred during hospitalization. Another cohort was enrolled for external validation. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the model. Results: A total of 1493 eligible patients with AMI were enrolled as the training set, of whom 70 (4.7%) developed VA during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the VA set than in the non-VA set (31.4% vs 2.7%, P=0.001). The independent predictors of VA in patients with AMI including Killip grade ≥3, STEMI patients, LVEF <50%, frequent premature ventricular beats, serum potassium <3.5 mmol/L, type 2 diabetes, and creatinine level. The AUC of the model for predicting VT/VF in the training set was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.763-0.866). A total of 1149 cases were enrolled from Xuzhou Center Hospital as the external validation set. The AUC of the model in the external validation set for predicting VT/VF was 0.755 (95% CI: 0.687-0.823). Calibration curves indicated a good consistency between the predicted and the observed probabilities of VA in both sets. Conclusion: We have established a clinical prediction risk score for predicting the occurrence of VA in AMI patients. The prediction score is easy to use, performs well and can be used to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Myocardial InfarctionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArea Under CurveArrhythmias, CardiacHumansacute myocardial infarctionrisk stratificationscoring systemventricular flutter and fibrillationventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID36851975
PMCPMC9961152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.