Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851944›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

An Equity Analysis of Zero-Dose Children in India Using the National Family Health Survey Data: Status, Challenges, and Next Steps.

Gunjan Taneja, Eshita Datta, Mahima Sapru, Mira Johri, Kapil Singh, Harkabir S Jandu, Shyamashree Das, Arindam Ray, Kayla Laserson, Veena Dhawan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gunjan TanejaInfectious Disease Cluster, India Country Office, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, IND.
Eshita DattaSocial Impact Practice, Evalueserve, New Delhi, IND.
Mahima SapruSocial Impact Practice, Evalueserve, New Delhi, IND.
Mira JohriSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, CAN.
Kapil SinghImmunization Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, IND.
Harkabir S JanduStrategy, Clinton Health Access Initiative, New Delhi, IND.
Shyamashree DasInfectious Disease Cluster, India Country Office, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, IND.
Arindam RayInfectious Disease Cluster, India Country Office, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, IND.
Kayla LasersonInfectious Disease Cluster, India Country Office, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, IND.
Veena DhawanImmunization Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, IND.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare · INUniversité de Montréal · CAEvalueserve (India) · INBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USClinton Health Access Initiative · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background While immunization programs across the world have made considerable progress, children and communities continue to be beyond the reach of healthcare services. Globally, they are now referred to as zero-dose (ZD) children (those who have not received a single dose of diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus-containing vaccine). Pre-COVID-19 pandemic analyses suggest that nearly 50% of vaccine-preventable deaths occur among ZD children. Two-thirds of these children live in extremely poor households suffering from multiple deprivations including lack of access to reproductive health services, water, and sanitation. Hence, ZD children have now been prioritized as a key cohort for identification and integration with the health systems as we build back from the pandemic. Methodology Extracting data from the last two National Family Health Survey (NFHS) rounds (NFHS 4, 2015-2016 and NFHS 5, 2019-2021), this study aims to ascertain the status of ZD children aged 12-23 months in India, the challenges, and the necessary action agenda going forward. Data were analyzed for equity determinants such as gender, place of residence, religion, birth order, caste, and mother's schooling. Key determinants included the change in ZD prevalence at the national, state, and district levels; variations across equity parameters and states with maximum improvements; and disparity across these indicators. A correlation analysis was also conducted to understand the nature of the association between ZD prevalence and critical maternal and child health indicators. Results The overall ZD prevalence between the two rounds was reduced by 4.1% (10.5-6.4%). A total of 26 states in the country reported a ZD prevalence of <10% in NFHS 5 compared to 18 in NFHS 4. In total, 324 districts reported a ZD prevalence of <5%, and 145 districts reported a prevalence of >10%. The equity parameters reflected a slow-footed reduction among ZD for girl children, across urban geographies, firstborn children, mothers with 12 or more years of schooling, and children in families with the highest wealth quintiles. A negative correlation accentuated between the two NFHS rounds was established between first-trimester registration, four or more antenatal visits, institutional deliveries, and ZD prevalence. Conclusions The findings point toward sustained improvement across key equity parameters, however, challenges do exist. Moreover, the impact of the pandemic on immunization programs across the globe and in India is bound to halt and reverse the progress and potentiate further inequities. It is thus imperative that continued and augmented efforts are continued to identify, integrate, and immunize ZD children, families, and communities.

Indexed as

equityimmunizationnational family health surveyvaccinationzero dose

Identifiers

PMID36851944
PMCPMC9963392
OpenAlexW4321790908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.