ReviewAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2020
Prognostic factors in patients with burns.
Review in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Epidemiology and prognosis of burn injuries in China: a meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Red blood cell distribution width at admission and the short-term mortality of patients with severe burn injury: a meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Mortality Scoring Systems in Patients With Severe Burns: Identifying Key Predictors of Mortality and Comparative Analysis Between Survivors and Non-Survivors.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- A comment on prognostic factors in burns.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are many various medical scales used in different clinical situations for scoring and prognostication the disease outcome. Burns are a group of heterogeneous disorders, which, depending on severity, may be treated in various settings - from outpatient clinic to intensive care units. Consequently they are also associated with different outcome. Over the years many scales and models were created to assess the prognosis and, in consequence, to help choosing the mode of treatment. Simultaneously constant improvement in intensive care reduces the predictive value of older models. In this paper authors searched the available literature for prognostic factors in burn patients as well as for clinical scales based on that disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.