Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851540›Full record

ArticleViruses2023

The Outcome of BNT162b2, ChAdOx1-Sand mRNA-1273 Vaccines and Two Boosters: A Prospective Longitudinal Real-World Study.

Sanaa M Kamal, Moheyeldeen Mohamed Naghib, Moataz Daadour, Mansour N Alsuliman, Ziad G Alanazi, Abdulaziz Abdullah Basalem, Abdulaziz M Alaskar, Khaled Saed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sanaa M KamalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Moheyeldeen Mohamed NaghibDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Moataz DaadourDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour N AlsulimanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Ziad G AlanaziDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Abdullah BasalemDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz M AlaskarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled SaedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University College of Medicine, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses has yet to be evaluated in longitudinal head-to-head studies. This single-center longitudinal study assessed the effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273 vaccines and assessed two BNT162b2 boosters in 1550 participants, of whom 26% had comorbidities. In addition, the SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics was monitored. A group of 1500 unvaccinated subjects was included as the controls. The study's endpoint was the development of virologically-proven COVID-19 cases after vaccine completion, while the secondary endpoint was hospitalizations due to severe COVID-19. Overall, 23 (4.6%), 16 (3%), and 18 (3.8%) participants vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273, respectively, developed COVID-19 after vaccine completion, with an effectiveness of 89%, 92%, and 90%. Ten COVID-19 cases were reported in participants with comorbidities, three of whom were hospitalized. No hospitalizations occurred after boosters. SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels peaked 2-4 weeks after the second vaccine dose but declined after a mean of 28.50 ± 3.48 weeks. Booster doses significantly enhanced antibody responses. Antibody titers ≤ 154 U/mL were associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 emergence. Thus, COVID-19 vaccines effectively reduced COVID-19 and prevented severe disease. The vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses declined after 28-32 weeks. Booster doses induced significant maintained responses. SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may help determine the timing and need for vaccine booster doses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vaccines2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansLongitudinal StudiesmRNA VaccinesProspective StudiesSandSARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesSandVaccinesbooster vaccines dosesCOVID-19COVID-19-related diseaseeffectivenessSARS CoV-2 antibodyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID36851540
PMCPMC9960999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.