Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851519›Full record

ArticleViruses2023

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reducing the Time Required for COVID-19 RT-PCR Testing.

Yoonje Lee, Yu-Seop Kim, Da In Lee, Seri Jeong, Gu Hyun Kang, Yong Soo Jang, Wonhee Kim, Hyun Young Choi, Jae Guk Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoonje LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6478-7568
Yu-Seop KimDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1645-4173
Da In LeeDepartment of Convergence Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0523-3298
Seri JeongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul 07441, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4199-7033
Gu Hyun KangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.
Yong Soo JangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.
Wonhee KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7055-2500
Hyun Young ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.
Jae Guk KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-4497
Hallym University · KRHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Rapid and accurate negative discrimination enables efficient management of scarce isolated bed resources and adequate patient accommodation in the majority of areas experiencing an explosion of confirmed cases due to Omicron mutations. Until now, methods for artificial intelligence or deep learning to replace time-consuming RT-PCR have relied on CXR, chest CT, blood test results, or clinical information. (2) Methods: We proposed and compared five different types of deep learning algorithms (RNN, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, GRU, and transformer) for reducing the time required for RT-PCR diagnosis by learning the change in fluorescence value derived over time during the RT-PCR process. (3) Results: Among the five deep learning algorithms capable of training time series data, Bi-LSTM and GRU were shown to be able to decrease the time required for RT-PCR diagnosis by half or by 25% without significantly impairing the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 RT-PCR test. (4) Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of the model developed in this study when 40 cycles of RT-PCR are used for diagnosis shows the possibility of nearly halving the time required for RT-PCR diagnosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 TestingHumansCOVID-19deep learningdiagnosisRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36851519
PMCPMC9966023
OpenAlexW4317734919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.