Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851298›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Policy Endorsement and Booster Shot: Exploring Politicized Determinants for Acceptance of a Third Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine in China.

Ruifen Zhang, Jun Yan, Hepeng Jia, Xi Luo, Qinliang Liu, Jingke Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruifen ZhangSchool of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215127, China.
Jun YanSchool of Journalism and Information Communication, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Hepeng JiaSchool of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215127, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-394X
Xi LuoSchool of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215127, China.
Qinliang LiuSchool of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215127, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6053-3269
Jingke LinSchool of Journalism and Communication, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

Key Project "Study on the permanent mechanism of communicating scientific spirit and professionalism in the digital era" of the National Social Science Foundation of China No.21AZD013Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province"A study on the Weibo framework of 'great anti-epidemic spirit' under the new situation of COVID-19 pandemic pre-ventions" KYCX22_3168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China's recent termination of strict COVID-19 control necessitates taking a booster vaccine shot as a precaution against the pandemic as quickly as possible. A large body of research has examined people's attitudes toward and intentions for the booster shot. However, most studies failed to explore how China's sociopolitical context has shaped their attitude regarding the booster jab take-up. The current study utilizes data from a national survey adopting quota sampling to analyze the Chinese public's medical and non-medical considerations to determine their intention for the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The study found that thanks to China's initial successful lockdown policies, personal risk and benefit perceptions did not dominate their views regarding booster vaccination. Instead, respondents' gender, nationalism, endorsement of the zero-COVID policy, self-efficacy regarding vaccination, and perceived infection severity were the major factors underlying their booster shot intention. The situation highlights how the politicized context of China's COVID-19 control has impacted people's plans to practice preventive behaviors. It is necessary to offset the negative consequences. One strategy is to educate the Chinese public with more medically relevant information to help them make rational choices regarding vaccination and other protective measures. On the other hand, such education can utilize this nationalistic mental status to enhance the persuasion effect.

Indexed as

booster shotCOVID-19nationalismpolicy endorsementvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36851298
PMCPMC9962357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.