Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851222›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

Do Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies Have an Impact on Pregnancy Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ennio Conte, Raffaella Di Girolamo, Francesco D'Antonio, Antonio Raffone, Daniele Neola, Gabriele Saccone, Michela Dell'Aquila, Laura Sarno, Marco Miceli, Luigi Carbone and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ennio ConteDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Raffaella Di GirolamoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8893-454X
Francesco D'AntonioCenter for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Antonio RaffoneDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5443-2333
Daniele NeolaDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gabriele SacconeDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Michela Dell'AquilaDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Laura SarnoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-7946
Marco MiceliDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-1488
Luigi CarboneDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-1876
Giuseppe Maria MaruottiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used as a rescue strategy for pregnant women affected by COVID-19. To explore its impact on maternal-fetal health, we included all observational studies reporting maternal, fetal, delivery and neonatal outcomes in women who underwent mAbs infusion for COVID-19. Primary outcome was the percentage of preterm delivery. We used meta-analyses of proportions to combine data for maternal, fetal, delivery and neonatal outcome of women treated with mAbs for COVID-19 and reported pooled proportions and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables or mean difference (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables. Preterm birth was observed in 22.8% of cases (95% CI 12.9-34.3). Fetal distress was reported in 4.2% (95% CI 1.6-8.2). Gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia were observed in 3.0% (95% CI 0.8-6.8) and 3.4% (95% CI 0.8-7.5) of cases, respectively. Fetal growth restriction was observed in 3.2% of fetuses (95% CI 0.8-7.0). Secondary prophylaxis with mAbs is currently considered the best treatment option for people with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease. More attention should be paid to infants born from mothers who were treated with mAbs, for the risk of immunosuppression.

Indexed as

COVID-19monoclonal antibody (mAb)pregnancy outcomepreterm birthSARS-CoV-2systematic review

Identifiers

PMID36851222
PMCPMC9962092
OpenAlexW4319080598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.