Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851204›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Safety and Immunogenicity of Betuvax-CoV-2, an RBD-Fc-Based SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Vaccine: Preliminary Results of the First-in-Human, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

Aleksandr V Kudriavtsev, Anna V Vakhrusheva, Nickolay A Kryuchkov, Maria E Frolova, Konstantin A Blagodatskikh, Taras V Ivanishin, Milana Djonovic, Ekaterina A Romanovskaya-Romanko, Anton N Kovalenko, Dmitry A Lioznov and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05270954 (Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Parallel-group Clinical Study of Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of the Betuvax-CoV-2 Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine, Suspension for Intramuscular Administration in Healthy Adult Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05270954 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Parallel-group Clinical Study of Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of the Betuvax-CoV-2 Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine, Suspension for Intramuscular Administration in Healthy Adult Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorArtgen BiotechRan2021 to 2022Enrolled116ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsBetuvax-CoV-2, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandr V KudriavtsevBetuvax LLC, 121096 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3918-5618
Anna V VakhrushevaBetuvax LLC, 121096 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7948-1254
Nickolay A KryuchkovClinical Excellence Group LLC, 127051 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8960-776X
Maria E FrolovaPJSC Human Stem Cells Institute, 129110 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-6614
Konstantin A BlagodatskikhCenter of Genetics and Reproductive Medicine "Genetico", 119333 Moscow, Russia.
Taras V IvanishinBetuvax LLC, 121096 Moscow, Russia.
Milana DjonovicPJSC Human Stem Cells Institute, 129110 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina A Romanovskaya-RomankoDepartment of Vaccinology, Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197376 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anton N KovalenkoClinical Excellence Group LLC, 127051 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry A LioznovDepartment of Vaccinology, Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197376 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tatiana G ZubkovaDepartment of Vaccinology, Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197376 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Svetlana V TeplykhProfessor Clinic LLC, 614070 Perm, Russia.
Rodion A OseshnyukEcosafety Center LLC, 195000 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Marina A StukovaDepartment of Vaccinology, Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197376 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Artur A IsaevPJSC Human Stem Cells Institute, 129110 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5848-5117
Igor V KrasilnikovDepartment of Vaccinology, Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197376 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUHuman Stem Cells Institute PJSC (Russia) · RUMoscow Clinical Scientific Center · RUResearch Centre for Medical Genetics · RU

Funding

Betuvax LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19, being a life-threatening infection that evolves rapidly, remains a major public health concern calling for the development of vaccines with broad protection against different pathogenic strains and high immunogenicity. Aside from this, other concerns in mass immunization settings are also the scalability of production and relative affordability of the technology. In that regard, adjuvanted protein vaccines with particles mimicking the virus stand out among known vaccine technologies. The "Betuvax-CoV-2" vaccine, developed on the basis of a recombinant protein and an adjuvant, has already been tested in preclinical studies and has advanced to clinical evaluation. Open, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized phase I/II clinical trial of the "Betuvax-CoV-2," recombinant protein subunit vaccine based on the S-protein RBD fused with the Fc-fragment of IgG, was conducted to evaluate safety and immunogenicity in response to the vaccination.

methodsIn the phase I/II clinical trial, 116 healthy adult men and women, ages 18-58, were enrolled: 20 in Stage I, and 96 in Stage II. In Stage I, 20 µg of the vaccine was administered intramuscularly on day 2, and either 5 µg (group 1) or 20 µg (group 2) on day 30. In Stage II, 20 µg of the vaccine was administered intramuscularly on day 2, and either 5 µg (group 3) or 20 µg (group 4) on day 30. In group 5, both injections were replaced with placebo. The primary outcome measures were safety (number of participants with adverse events throughout the study) and antigen-specific humoral immunity (SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies measured by ELISA and CMIA). Antigen-specific cell-mediated immunity and changes in neutralizing antibodies (detected with a SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay) were measured as a secondary outcome. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Identifier: NCT05270954).

findingsBoth vaccine formulations (20 µg + 5 µg and 20 µg + 20 µg) were safe and well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild, and no serious adverse events were detected. On day 51,anti-SARS-CoV-2 total and IgG antibody titers and anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies were significantly higher in the vaccine groups (both formulations) than in the placebo. A more pronounced CD4+-mediated immune response was observed in the group of volunteers administered with the 20 + 20 μg vaccine formulation. INTERPRETATIONS: RBD-Fc-based COVID-19 "Betuvax-CoV-2" vaccine in doses (20 + 5 µg and 20 + 20 µg) demonstrated an excellent safety profile and induced a strong humoral response. Further research on the protective effectiveness of the "Betuvax-CoV-2" vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 is on its way.

Indexed as

betulinBetuvax-CoV-2clinical trialCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2subunit vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36851204
PMCPMC9965088
OpenAlexW4318818379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.