Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851190›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

The Public Health Contribution of Sentiment Analysis of Monkeypox Tweets to Detect Polarities Using the CNN-LSTM Model.

Orlando Iparraguirre-Villanueva, Aldo Alvarez-Risco, Jose Luis Herrera Salazar, Saul Beltozar-Clemente, Joselyn Zapata-Paulini, Jaime A Yáñez, Michael Cabanillas-Carbonell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Orlando Iparraguirre-VillanuevaFacultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad Autónoma del Perú, Lima 15842, Peru.
Aldo Alvarez-RiscoCarrera de Negocios Internacionales Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Económicas, Universidad de Lima, Lima 15023, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-0786-6555
Jose Luis Herrera SalazarFacultad de Ingeniería, Ciencias y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Ica, Chincha Alta 11701, Peru.
Saul Beltozar-ClementeDirección de Cursos Básicos, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru.
Joselyn Zapata-PauliniEscuela de Posgrado, Universidad Continental, Lima 12000, Peru.
Jaime A YáñezVicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima 15046, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-1829
Michael Cabanillas-CarbonellEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9675-0970
Universidad Autónoma de IcaUniversidad Autónoma del PerúUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversidad Continental · PEUniversidad de Lima · PEUniversidad Norbert Wiener · PEUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox is a rare disease caused by the monkeypox virus. This disease was considered eradicated in 1980 and was believed to affect rodents and not humans. However, recent years have seen a massive outbreak of monkeypox in humans, setting off worldwide alerts from health agencies. As of September 2022, the number of confirmed cases in Peru had reached 1964. Although most monkeypox patients have been discharged, we cannot neglect the monitoring of the population with respect to the monkeypox virus. Lately, the population has started to express their feelings and opinions through social media, specifically Twitter, as it is the most used social medium and is an ideal space to gather what people think about the monkeypox virus. The information imparted through this medium can be in different formats, such as text, videos, images, audio, etc. The objective of this work is to analyze the positive, negative, and neutral feelings of people who publish their opinions on Twitter with the hashtag #Monkeypox. To find out what people think about this disease, a hybrid-based model architecture built on CNN and LSTM was used to determine the prediction accuracy. The prediction result obtained from the total monkeypox data was 83% accurate. Other performance metrics were also used to evaluate the model, such as specificity, recall level, and F1 score, representing 99%, 85%, and 88%, respectively. The results also showed the polarity of feelings through the CNN-LSTM confusion matrix, where 45.42% of people expressed neither positive nor negative opinions, while 19.45% expressed negative and fearful feelings about this infectious disease. The results of this work contribute to raising public awareness about the monkeypox virus.

Indexed as

CNNLSTMmonkeypoxsentimenttweets

Identifiers

PMID36851190
PMCPMC9966732
OpenAlexW4318706770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.