Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36851189›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

Determinants of Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Healthcare and Public Health Professionals: A Review.

Fathema Ghare, Rehab Meckawy, Michael Moore, Marta Lomazzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fathema GhareWorld Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA), Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Campus Biotech-G6, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-4310
Rehab MeckawyWorld Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA), Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Campus Biotech-G6, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6489-5518
Michael MooreWorld Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA), Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Campus Biotech-G6, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Marta LomazziWorld Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA), Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Campus Biotech-G6, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline (Italy) Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinations of healthcare workers (HCWs) aim to directly protect them from occupational diseases, and indirectly protect their patients and communities. However, studies increasingly highlight that HCWs can be vaccine hesitant. This review aims to analyze HCWs' and public health professionals' sentiments toward COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) vaccination and determinants across different countries. A search strategy was conducted in PubMed using keywords such as "COVID-19", "sentiment/acceptance", "healthcare workers", "vaccine hesitancy", and "influenza". A total of 56 articles were selected for in-depth analyses. The highest COVID-19 vaccination uptake was found in an Italian study (98.9%), and the lowest in Cyprus (30%). Older age, male gender, the medical profession, higher education level, presence of comorbidities, and previous influenza vaccination were associated with vaccine acceptance. Factors for low acceptance were perceived side effects of the vaccine, perceived lack of effectiveness and efficacy, and lack of information and knowledge. Factors for acceptance were knowledge, confidence in the vaccine, government, and health authorities, and increased perception of fear and susceptibility. All studies focused on healthcare providers; no studies focusing on public health professionals' sentiments could be found, indicating a gap in research that needs to be addressed. Interventions must be implemented with vaccination campaigns to improve COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.

Indexed as

attitudesCOVID-19health care personnelpublic health professionalssentimentvaccinevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36851189
PMCPMC9961323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.