Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850898›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Optimization of Gradient Descent Parameters in Attitude Estimation Algorithms.

Karla Sever, Leonardo Max Golušin, Josip Lončar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karla SeverDepartment of Communication and Space Technologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Leonardo Max GolušinDepartment of Communication and Space Technologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Josip LončarDepartment of Communication and Space Technologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8616-4804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attitude estimation methods provide modern consumer, industrial, and space systems with an estimate of a body orientation based on noisy sensor measurements. The gradient descent algorithm is one of the most recent methods for optimal attitude estimation, whose iterative nature demands adequate adjustment of the algorithm parameters, which is often overlooked in the literature. Here, we present the effects of the step size, the maximum number of iterations, and the initial quaternion, as well as different propagation methods on the quality of the estimation in noiseless and noisy conditions. A novel figure of merit and termination criterion that defines the algorithm's accuracy is proposed. Furthermore, the guidelines for selecting the optimal set of parameters in order to achieve the highest accuracy of the estimate using the fewest iterations are proposed and verified in simulations and experimentally based on the measurements acquired from an in-house developed model of a satellite attitude determination and control system. The proposed attitude estimation method based on the gradient descent algorithm and complementary filter automatically adjusts the number of iterations with the average below 0.5, reducing the demand on the processing power and energy consumption and causing it to be suitable for low-power applications.

Indexed as

attitude estimationcomplementary filterEuler anglesgradient descent algorithmoptimizationrotational quaternion

Identifiers

PMID36850898
PMCPMC9962275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.