ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Deep Learning Architecture Using 3D Vectorcardiogram to Detect R-Peaks in ECG with Enhanced Precision.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Confounder Analysis of Electrocardiogram Signals in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at 1.5, 3 and 7 T-Assessing Standardized Electrode Positions and Sequence Types-Towards Quality Assurance.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- AI-Based QRS Onset Detection in the Early Ventricular Activation Site ECGs.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Article
- Delineation of 12-Lead ECG Representative Beats Using Convolutional Encoder-Decoders with Residual and Recurrent Connections.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Generative Adversarial Network to Synthesize 3D Magnetohydrodynamic Distortions for Electrocardiogram Analyses Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Providing reliable detection of QRS complexes is key in automated analyses of electrocardiograms (ECG). Accurate and timely R-peak detections provide a basis for ECG-based diagnoses and to synchronize radiologic, electrophysiologic, or other medical devices. Compared with classical algorithms, deep learning (DL) architectures have demonstrated superior accuracy and high generalization capacity. Furthermore, they can be embedded on edge devices for real-time inference. 3D vectorcardiograms (VCG) provide a unifying framework for detecting R-peaks regardless of the acquisition strategy or number of ECG leads. In this article, a DL architecture was demonstrated to provide enhanced precision when trained and applied on 3D VCG, with no pre-processing nor post-processing steps. Experiments were conducted on four different public databases. Using the proposed approach, high F1-scores of 99.80% and 99.64% were achieved in leave-one-out cross-validation and cross-database validation protocols, respectively. False detections, measured by a precision of 99.88% or more, were significantly reduced compared with recent state-of-the-art methods tested on the same databases, without penalty in the number of missed peaks, measured by a recall of 99.39% or more. This approach can provide new applications for devices where precision, or positive predictive value, is essential, for instance cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.