ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Beef Quality Classification with Reduced E-Nose Data Features According to Beef Cut Types.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leakage-Free Benchmarking of Electronic Noses for Beef Freshness: A Signal-Richness Criterion for Model Selection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Sensor-Based Electronic Nose for Food Quality and Safety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Non-destructive identification of commercial jerky types based on multi-band hyperspectral imaging with machine learning.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring safe food supplies has recently become a serious problem all over the world. Controlling the quality, spoilage, and standing time for products with a short shelf life is a quite difficult problem. However, electronic noses can make all these controls possible. In this study, which aims to develop a different approach to the solution of this problem, electronic nose data obtained from 12 different beef cuts were classified. In the dataset, there are four classes (1: excellent, 2: good, 3: acceptable, and 4: spoiled) indicating beef quality. The classifications were performed separately for each cut and all cut shapes. The ANOVA method was used to determine the active features in the dataset with data for 12 features. The same classification processes were carried out by using the three active features selected by the ANOVA method. Three different machine learning methods, Artificial Neural Network, K Nearest Neighbor, and Logistic Regression, which are frequently used in the literature, were used in classifications. In the experimental studies, a classification accuracy of 100% was obtained as a result of the classification performed with ANN using the data obtained by combining all the tables in the dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.