ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Constant Force-Tracking Control Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning in Dynamic Auscultation Environment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intelligent medical robots can effectively help doctors carry out a series of medical diagnoses and auxiliary treatments and alleviate the current shortage of social personnel. Therefore, this paper investigates how to use deep reinforcement learning to solve dynamic medical auscultation tasks. We propose a constant force-tracking control method for dynamic environments and a modeling method that satisfies physical characteristics to simulate the dynamic breathing process and design an optimal reward function for the task of achieving efficient learning of the control strategy. We have carried out a large number of simulation experiments, and the error between the tracking of normal force and expected force is basically within ±0.5 N. The control strategy is tested in a real environment. The preliminary results show that the control strategy performs well in the constant force-tracking of medical auscultation tasks. The contact force is always within a safe and stable range, and the average contact force is about 5.2 N.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.