Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850763›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Using Mobile Edge AI to Detect and Map Diseases in Citrus Orchards.

Jonathan C F da Silva, Mateus Coelho Silva, Eduardo J S Luz, Saul Delabrida, Ricardo A R Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan C F da SilvaDepartamento de Computação, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Rua Diogo Vasconcelos-128-Bauxita, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2214-397X
Mateus Coelho SilvaDepartamento de Computação, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Rua Diogo Vasconcelos-128-Bauxita, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3717-1906
Eduardo J S LuzDepartamento de Computação, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Rua Diogo Vasconcelos-128-Bauxita, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-1559
Saul DelabridaDepartamento de Computação, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Rua Diogo Vasconcelos-128-Bauxita, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8961-5313
Ricardo A R OliveiraDepartamento de Computação, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Rua Diogo Vasconcelos-128-Bauxita, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-1523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep Learning models have presented promising results when applied to Agriculture 4.0. Among other applications, these models can be used in disease detection and fruit counting. Deep Learning models usually have many layers in the architecture and millions of parameters. This aspect hinders the use of Deep Learning on mobile devices as they require a large amount of processing power for inference. In addition, the lack of high-quality Internet connectivity in the field impedes the usage of cloud computing, pushing the processing towards edge devices. This work describes the proposal of an edge AI application to detect and map diseases in citrus orchards. The proposed system has low computational demand, enabling the use of low-footprint models for both detection and classification tasks. We initially compared AI algorithms to detect fruits on trees. Specifically, we analyzed and compared YOLO and Faster R-CNN. Then, we studied lean AI models to perform the classification task. In this context, we tested and compared the performance of MobileNetV2, EfficientNetV2-B0, and NASNet-Mobile. In the detection task, YOLO and Faster R-CNN had similar AI performance metrics, but YOLO was significantly faster. In the image classification task, MobileNetMobileV2 and EfficientNetV2-B0 obtained an accuracy of 100%, while NASNet-Mobile had a 98% performance. As for the timing performance, MobileNetV2 and EfficientNetV2-B0 were the best candidates, while NASNet-Mobile was significantly worse. Furthermore, MobileNetV2 had a 10% better performance than EfficientNetV2-B0. Finally, we provide a method to evaluate the results from these algorithms towards describing the disease spread using statistical parametric models and a genetic algorithm to perform the parameters' regression. With these results, we validated the proposed pipeline, enabling the usage of adequate AI models to develop a mobile edge AI solution.

Indexed as

AgricultureCitrusAlgorithmsArtificial Intelligencecitrus orchardsdeep learningedge AImobile edge computing

Identifiers

PMID36850763
PMCPMC9959271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.