Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850738›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Position and Attitude Determination in Urban Canyon with Tightly Coupled Sensor Fusion and a Prediction-Based GNSS Cycle Slip Detection Using Low-Cost Instruments.

Bálint Vanek, Márton Farkas, Szabolcs Rózsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bálint VanekInstitute for Computer Science and Control, Eötvös Lóránd Research Network, Kende u. 13-17, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2458-2725
Márton FarkasInstitute for Computer Science and Control, Eötvös Lóránd Research Network, Kende u. 13-17, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-4989
Szabolcs RózsaDepartment of Geodesy and Surveying, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-6455

Funding

European Union RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a position and attitude estimation algorithm of moving platforms based on the tightly coupled sensor fusion of low-cost multi baseline GNSS, inertial, magnetic and barometric observations obtained by low-cost sensors and affordable dual-frequency GNSS receivers. The sensor fusion algorithm is realized by an Extended Kalman Filter and estimates the states including GNSS receiver inter-channel biases, integer ambiguities and non-GNSS receiver biases. Tightly coupled sensor fusion increases the reliability of the position and attitude solution in challenging environments such as urban canyons by utilizing the inertial observations in case of GNSS outage. Moreover, GNSS observations can be efficiently used to mitigate IMU sensor drifts. Standard GNSS cycle slips detection methods, such as the application of triple differences or linear combinations such as Melbourne-Wübbena combination and the phase ionospheric residual extended TurboEdit method. However, these techniques are not well suited for the localization in quickly changing environments such as urban canyons. We present a new method of tightly coupled sensor fusion supported by a prediction based cycle slip detection technique, applied to a GNSS setup using three antennas leading to multiple moving baselines on the platform. Thus, not only the GNSS signal properties but also the dynamics of the moving platform are considered in the cycle slip detection. The developed algorithm is tested in an open-sky validation measurement and two sets of measurement in an urban canyon area. The sensor fusion algorithm processes the data sets using the proposed prediction-based cycle slip method, the loss-of-lock indicator-based, and for comparison, the Melbourne-Wübbena and the TurboEdit cycle slip detection methods are also included. The obtained position and attitude estimation results are compared to the internal solution of raw data source GNSS receivers and to the observations of a high-accuracy GNSS/INS unit including a fiber optic gyro. The validation test confirms the proper cycle slip detection in an ideal environment. The more challenging urban canyon test results show the reliability and the accuracy of the proposed method. In the case of the second urban canyon test, the proposed method improved the integer ambiguity resolution success rate by 19% and these results show the lowest horizontal and vertical coordinate distortion in comparison of the linear combination and the loss-of-lock-based cycle slip methods.

Indexed as

cycle slip detectionGNSS-INS fusionlow-cost sensor integrationmoving baseline GNSSurban canyon environment

Identifiers

PMID36850738
PMCPMC9965468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.