Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850622›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Study of an Online Tracking System for Spark Images of Abrasive Belt-Polishing Workpieces.

Jian Huang, Guangpeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jian HuangSchool of Mechanical and Precision Instrument Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China.
Guangpeng ZhangSchool of Mechanical and Precision Instrument Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China.

Funding

A new non-contact perceptual measurement method for abrasive belt polishing material removal rate based on audio-visual information fusion 52275511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the manual grinding of blades, the workers can estimate the material removal rate based on their experiences from observing the characteristics of the grinding sparks, leading to low grinding accuracy and low efficiency and affecting the processing quality of the blades. As an alternative to the recognition of spark images by the human eye, we used the deep learning algorithm YOLO5 to perform target detection on spark images and obtain spark image regions. First the spark images generated during one turbine blade-grinding process were collected, and some of the images were selected as training samples, with the remaining images used as test samples, which were labelled with LabelImg. Afterwards, the selected images were trained with YOLO5 to obtain an optimisation model. In the end, the trained optimisation model was used to predict the images of the test set. The proposed method was able to detect spark image regions quickly and accurately, with an average accuracy of 0.995. YOLO4 was also used to train and predict spark images, and the two methods were compared. Our findings show that YOLO5 is faster and more accurate than the YOLO4 target detection algorithm and can replace manual observation, laying a specific foundation for the automatic segmentation of spark images and the study of the relationship between the material removal rate and spark images at a later stage, which has some practical value.

Indexed as

abrasive belt grindingspark imagestarget detectionYOLO5

Identifiers

PMID36850622
PMCPMC9966948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.