Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850617›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Bayesian Network Approach to Explainable Reinforcement Learning with Distal Information.

Rudy Milani, Maximilian Moll, Renato De Leone, Stefan Pickl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rudy MilaniFaculty of Computer Science, Universitaet der Bundeswehr Muenchen, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0733-3142
Maximilian MollFaculty of Computer Science, Universitaet der Bundeswehr Muenchen, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0270-3039
Renato De LeoneSchool of Science and Technology, University of Camerino, via Madonna delle Carceri 9, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9783-608X
Stefan PicklFaculty of Computer Science, Universitaet der Bundeswehr Muenchen, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-6259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, Artificial Intelligence systems have expanded their competence field from research to industry and daily life, so understanding how they make decisions is becoming fundamental to reducing the lack of trust between users and machines and increasing the transparency of the model. This paper aims to automate the generation of explanations for model-free Reinforcement Learning algorithms by answering "why" and "why not" questions. To this end, we use Bayesian Networks in combination with the NOTEARS algorithm for automatic structure learning. This approach complements an existing framework very well and demonstrates thus a step towards generating explanations with as little user input as possible. This approach is computationally evaluated in three benchmarks using different Reinforcement Learning methods to highlight that it is independent of the type of model used and the explanations are then rated through a human study. The results obtained are compared to other baseline explanation models to underline the satisfying performance of the framework presented in terms of increasing the understanding, transparency and trust in the action chosen by the agent.

Indexed as

Bayesian Networkcausal explanationExplainable Reinforcement Learninghuman studymodel-free methods

Identifiers

PMID36850617
PMCPMC9961455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.