Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850595›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Uncertainty Estimation for Quantitative Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Nucleic Acids.

Konstantin Semenov, Aleksandr Taraskin, Alexandra Yurchenko, Irina Baranovskaya, Lada Purvinsh, Natalia Gyulikhandanova, Andrey Vasin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantin SemenovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandr TaraskinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexandra YurchenkoPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Irina BaranovskayaAugusta University, 1120 15th Str., Augusta, GA 30912, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4573-8466
Lada PurvinshThe University of Chicago, 947 E. 58th Str., Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-2154
Natalia GyulikhandanovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey VasinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, Polytechnicheskaya Str., 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-7139

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as part of World-class Research Center program: Advanced Digital Technologies contract No. 075-15-2022-311 dated by 20.04.2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper considers the evaluation of uncertainty of quantitative gel electrophoresis. To date, such uncertainty estimation presented in the literature are based on the multiple measurements performed for assessing the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility using standard samples. This paper shows how to estimate the uncertainty in cases where we cannot study scattering components of the results. The first point is dedicated to a case where we have standard samples (the direct expressions are shown). The second point considers the situation when standard samples are absent (the algorithm for estimating the lower bound for uncertainty is discussed). The role of the data processing algorithm is demonstrated.

Indexed as

Nucleic AcidsAlgorithmsElectrophoresis, Agar GelReproducibility of ResultsUncertaintyNucleic Acidselectrophoretic separationinaccurate data processingmetrological analysisnucleic acidsquantitative gel electrophoresisuncertainty propagation

Identifiers

PMID36850595
PMCPMC9966319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.