Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850592›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Trusted Operation of Cyber-Physical Processes Based on Assessment of the System's State and Operating Mode.

Elena Basan, Alexandr Basan, Alexey Nekrasov, Colin Fidge, Evgeniya Ishchukova, Anatoly Basyuk, Alexandr Lesnikov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena BasanInstitute for Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, Chekhova 2, 347922 Taganrog, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-4484
Alexandr BasanInstitute for Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, Chekhova 2, 347922 Taganrog, Russia.
Alexey NekrasovInstitute for Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, Chekhova 2, 347922 Taganrog, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-1145
Colin FidgeFaculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9410-7217
Evgeniya IshchukovaInstitute for Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, Chekhova 2, 347922 Taganrog, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6818-1608
Anatoly BasyukInstitute for Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, Chekhova 2, 347922 Taganrog, Russia.
Alexandr LesnikovInstitute for Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, Chekhova 2, 347922 Taganrog, Russia.
Southern Federal University · RUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-11-00184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the trusted operation of cyber-physical processes based on an assessment of the system's state and operating mode and present a method for detecting anomalies in the behavior of a cyber-physical system (CPS) based on the analysis of the data transmitted by its sensory subsystem. Probability theory and mathematical statistics are used to process and normalize the data in order to determine whether or not the system is in the correct operating mode and control process state. To describe the mode-specific control processes of a CPS, the paradigm of using cyber-physical parameters is taken as a basis, as it is the feature that most clearly reflects the system's interaction with physical processes. In this study, two metrics were taken as a sign of an anomaly: the probability of falling into the sensor values' confidence interval and parameter change monitoring. These two metrics, as well as the current mode evaluation, produce a final probability function for our trust in the CPS's currently executing control process, which is, in turn, determined by the operating mode of the system. Based on the results of this trust assessment, it is possible to draw a conclusion about the processing state in which the system is operating. If the score is higher than 0.6, it means the system is in a trusted state. If the score is equal to 0.6, it means the system is in an uncertain state. If the trust score tends towards zero, then the system can be interpreted as unstable or under stress due to a system failure or deliberate attack. Through a case study using cyber-attack data for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), it was found that the method works well. When we were evaluating the normal flight mode, there were no false positive anomaly estimates. When we were evaluating the UAV's state during an attack, a deviation and an untrusted state were detected. This method can be used to implement software solutions aimed at detecting system faults and cyber-attacks, and thus make decisions about the presence of malfunctions in the operation of a CPS, thereby minimizing the amount of knowledge and initial data about the system.

Indexed as

anomaliescyber-attackscyber-physical systemunmanned vehicleverification

Identifiers

PMID36850592
PMCPMC9963395
OpenAlexW4319985745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.