Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850584›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Research Challenges, Recent Advances, and Popular Datasets in Deep Learning-Based Underwater Marine Object Detection: A Review.

Meng Joo Er, Jie Chen, Yani Zhang, Wenxiao Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng Joo ErInstitute of Artificial Intelligence and Marine Robotics, College of Marine Electrical Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-7088
Jie ChenInstitute of Artificial Intelligence and Marine Robotics, College of Marine Electrical Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4313-0337
Yani ZhangInstitute of Artificial Intelligence and Marine Robotics, College of Marine Electrical Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Wenxiao GaoInstitute of Artificial Intelligence and Marine Robotics, College of Marine Electrical Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 3132019344Leading Scholar Grant, Dalian Maritime University 00253007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underwater marine object detection, as one of the most fundamental techniques in the community of marine science and engineering, has been shown to exhibit tremendous potential for exploring the oceans in recent years. It has been widely applied in practical applications, such as monitoring of underwater ecosystems, exploration of natural resources, management of commercial fisheries, etc. However, due to complexity of the underwater environment, characteristics of marine objects, and limitations imposed by exploration equipment, detection performance in terms of speed, accuracy, and robustness can be dramatically degraded when conventional approaches are used. Deep learning has been found to have significant impact on a variety of applications, including marine engineering. In this context, we offer a review of deep learning-based underwater marine object detection techniques. Underwater object detection can be performed by different sensors, such as acoustic sonar or optical cameras. In this paper, we focus on vision-based object detection due to several significant advantages. To facilitate a thorough understanding of this subject, we organize research challenges of vision-based underwater object detection into four categories: image quality degradation, small object detection, poor generalization, and real-time detection. We review recent advances in underwater marine object detection and highlight advantages and disadvantages of existing solutions for each challenge. In addition, we provide a detailed critical examination of the most extensively used datasets. In addition, we present comparative studies with previous reviews, notably those approaches that leverage artificial intelligence, as well as future trends related to this hot topic.

Indexed as

image quality degradationpoor generalizationpopular datasetssmall object detectionunderwater marine object detectionvision

Identifiers

PMID36850584
PMCPMC9966468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.