Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850576›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Task-Specific Adaptive Differential Privacy Method for Structured Data.

Assem Utaliyeva, Jinmyeong Shin, Yoon-Ho Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Assem UtaliyevaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 609-735, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-3944
Jinmyeong ShinSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 609-735, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8580-6887
Yoon-Ho ChoiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 609-735, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-5082

Funding

Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI21C1716National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1I1A3055233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data are needed to train machine learning (ML) algorithms, and in many cases often include private datasets that contain sensitive information. To preserve the privacy of data used while training ML algorithms, computer scientists have widely deployed anonymization techniques. These anonymization techniques have been widely used but are not foolproof. Many studies showed that ML models using anonymization techniques are vulnerable to various privacy attacks willing to expose sensitive information. As a privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML) technique that protects private data with sensitive information in ML, we propose a new task-specific adaptive differential privacy (DP) technique for structured data. The main idea of the proposed DP method is to adaptively calibrate the amount and distribution of random noise applied to each attribute according to the feature importance for the specific tasks of ML models and different types of data. From experimental results under various datasets, tasks of ML models, different DP mechanisms, and so on, we evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed task-specific adaptive DP method. Thus, we show that the proposed task-specific adaptive DP technique satisfies the model-agnostic property to be applied to a wide range of ML tasks and various types of data while resolving the privacy-utility trade-off problem.

Indexed as

differential privacymachine learningprivacy-preserving

Identifiers

PMID36850576
PMCPMC9966464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.