ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Pain Research: Understanding the Role of Electrodermal Activity for Automated Pain Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the Applications of Explainability in Wearable Data Analytics: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- From the Pain Matrix to Functional Networks: A Narrative Review of Chronic Pain Mechanisms Across Adult and Pediatric Populations with Emerging AI Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Public announcements and mask use during COVID-19 bridging regression and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A roadmap for artificial intelligence in pain medicine: current status, opportunities, and requirements.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025Review
- Current methods in explainable artificial intelligence and future prospects for integrative physiology.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Pseudo-labeling based adaptations of pain domain classifiers.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Experimental and Clinical Physiological Signal Dataset for Automated Pain Recognition.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Objective Measurement of Subjective Pain Perception with Autonomic Body Reactions in Healthy Subjects and Chronic Back Pain Patients: An Experimental Heat Pain Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Review of Voice-Based Pain Detection in Adults Using Artificial Intelligence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and especially deep learning methods have achieved outstanding results for various applications in the past few years. Pain recognition is one of them, as various models have been proposed to replace the previous gold standard with an automated and objective assessment. While the accuracy of such models could be increased incrementally, the understandability and transparency of these systems have not been the main focus of the research community thus far. Thus, in this work, several outcomes and insights of explainable artificial intelligence applied to the electrodermal activity sensor data of the PainMonit and BioVid Heat Pain Database are presented. For this purpose, the importance of hand-crafted features is evaluated using recursive feature elimination based on impurity scores in Random Forest (RF) models. Additionally, Gradient-weighted class activation mapping is applied to highlight the most impactful features learned by deep learning models. Our studies highlight the following insights: (1) Very simple hand-crafted features can yield comparative performances to deep learning models for pain recognition, especially when properly selected with recursive feature elimination. Thus, the use of complex neural networks should be questioned in pain recognition, especially considering their computational costs; and (2) both traditional feature engineering and deep feature learning approaches rely on simple characteristics of the input time-series data to make their decision in the context of automated pain recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.