Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850556›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Pain Research: Understanding the Role of Electrodermal Activity for Automated Pain Recognition.

Philip Gouverneur, Frédéric Li, Kimiaki Shirahama, Luisa Luebke, Wacław M Adamczyk, Tibor M Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke, Marcin Grzegorzek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Pseudo-labeling based adaptations of pain domain classifiers.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philip GouverneurInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8610-2291
Frédéric LiInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2110-4207
Kimiaki ShirahamaFaculty of Informatics, Kindai University, Higashiosaka 577-8502, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1843-5152
Luisa LuebkeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Institute of Health Sciences, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2504-4766
Wacław M AdamczykDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Institute of Health Sciences, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-8355
Tibor M SzikszayDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Institute of Health Sciences, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-2957
Kerstin LuedtkeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), Institute of Health Sciences, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-5469
Marcin GrzegorzekInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-8287

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01DS19008A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and especially deep learning methods have achieved outstanding results for various applications in the past few years. Pain recognition is one of them, as various models have been proposed to replace the previous gold standard with an automated and objective assessment. While the accuracy of such models could be increased incrementally, the understandability and transparency of these systems have not been the main focus of the research community thus far. Thus, in this work, several outcomes and insights of explainable artificial intelligence applied to the electrodermal activity sensor data of the PainMonit and BioVid Heat Pain Database are presented. For this purpose, the importance of hand-crafted features is evaluated using recursive feature elimination based on impurity scores in Random Forest (RF) models. Additionally, Gradient-weighted class activation mapping is applied to highlight the most impactful features learned by deep learning models. Our studies highlight the following insights: (1) Very simple hand-crafted features can yield comparative performances to deep learning models for pain recognition, especially when properly selected with recursive feature elimination. Thus, the use of complex neural networks should be questioned in pain recognition, especially considering their computational costs; and (2) both traditional feature engineering and deep feature learning approaches rely on simple characteristics of the input time-series data to make their decision in the context of automated pain recognition.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPainResearchdeep learningexplainable artificial intelligencehand-crafted featuresmachine learningpain perceptionpain recognitionphysiological signals

Identifiers

PMID36850556
PMCPMC9960387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.