Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850494›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Functional Living Skills in Patients with Major Neurocognitive Disorder Due to Degenerative or Non-Degenerative Conditions: Effectiveness of a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Training.

Simonetta Panerai, Valentina Catania, Francesco Rundo, Domenica Tasca, Sabrina Musso, Claudio Babiloni, Giuseppina Prestianni, Stefano Muratore, Raffaele Ferri

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simonetta PaneraiUnit of Psychology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6756
Valentina CataniaUnit of Psychology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.
Francesco RundoUnit of Bioinformatics and Statistics, Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.
Domenica TascaUnit of Psychology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.
Sabrina MussoUnit of Psychology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.
Claudio BabiloniDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-9839
Giuseppina PrestianniUnit of Psychology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.
Stefano MuratoreUnit of Psychology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.
Raffaele FerriUnit of Neurology I.C., Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, 94018 Troina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6937-3065

Funding

Ministero della Salute RC2018 - 2634475Regione Siciliana PO-FESR 2014-2020-Action 1.1.5 Project 3DLab Sicily- USE CASE: COREV-LAB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality has gained attention as an effective tool for cognitive, motor, and daily activity rehabilitation in patients with major neurocognitive disorder (M-NCD). The first objective of this study was to check for differences between M-NCD caused by degenerative and non-degenerative conditions (DC and NDC, respectively) in terms of relearning four functional living skills (FLSs), by means of a non-immersive virtual reality training (VRT). The second purpose was to verify whether spontaneous transfer from the virtual environment to the real environment occurred. Four FLS apps were developed in our institute (Information, Suitcase, Medicine, and Supermarket). A nonrandomized interventional study was carried out, comparing experimental and control groups (EG and CG, respectively). The study included three phases: in vivo test at T1; VRT at T2 only for EG; in vivo test at T3. During the in vivo test, the four FLSs were assessed in their natural environments. Both EG-DC and EG-NDC significantly improved in all of the VRT variable scores (the EG-NDC group seemed to show better outcomes than the EG-DC group). Moderate-to-high satisfaction with the VRT was reported. EG-DC and EG-NDC also enhanced their performances in the in vivo test. No statistically significant differences between them were found. CG-DC and CG-NDC improved only in the execution time of Information in the in vivo test. These findings confirm the ecological validity of VRT for FLSs.

Indexed as

DementiaVirtual RealityActivities of Daily LivingBiological AssayHumansPatientsdegenerative dementiafunctional living skillsneurocognitive disordersnon-degenerative dementiavirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36850494
PMCPMC9966630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.