Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850471›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluation of Growth Responses of Lettuce and Energy Efficiency of the Substrate and Smart Hydroponics Cropping System.

Monica Dutta, Deepali Gupta, Sangeeta Sahu, Suresh Limkar, Pawan Singh, Ashutosh Mishra, Manoj Kumar, Rahim Mutlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monica DuttaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India.
Deepali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-5248
Sangeeta SahuDepartment of Chemistry, Bhilai Institute of Technology, Raipur 493661, India.
Suresh LimkarDepartment of Artificial Intelligence & Data Science, AISSMS Institute of Information Technology, Pune 411001, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7837-9100
Pawan SinghDepartment of Computer Science, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer 305817, India.
Ashutosh MishraSchool of Integrated Technology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-5583
Manoj KumarFaculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 20183, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-5113-0639
Rahim MutluFaculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 20183, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-8744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart sensing devices enabled hydroponics, a concept of vertical farming that involves soilless technology that increases green area. Although the cultivation medium is water, hydroponic cultivation uses 13 ± 10 times less water and gives 10 ± 5 times better quality products compared with those obtained through the substrate cultivation medium. The use of smart sensing devices helps in continuous real-time monitoring of the nutrient requirements and the environmental conditions required by the crop selected for cultivation. This, in turn, helps in enhanced year-round agricultural production. In this study, lettuce, a leafy crop, is cultivated with the Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) setup of hydroponics, and the growth results are compared with cultivation in a substrate medium. The leaf growth was analyzed in terms of cultivation cycle, leaf length, leaf perimeter, and leaf count in both cultivation methods, where hydroponics outperformed substrate cultivation. The results of the 'AquaCrop simulator also showed similar results, not only qualitatively and quantitatively, but also in terms of sustainable growth and year-round production. The energy consumption of both the cultivation methods is compared, and it is found that hydroponics consumes 70 ± 11 times more energy compared to substrate cultivation. Finally, it is concluded that smart sensing devices form the backbone of precision agriculture, thereby multiplying crop yield by real-time monitoring of the agronomical variables.

Indexed as

Conservation of Energy ResourcesLactucaHydroponicsPhysical PhenomenaWaterWateragricultural productivityenergy efficienthydroponicsIoTnutrient film techniquesoft sensingsubstrate cultivationsustainable growth

Identifiers

PMID36850471
PMCPMC9967833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.