Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850434›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Atomic Force Microscopy Micro-Indentation Methods for Determining the Elastic Modulus of Murine Articular Cartilage.

Katherine M Arnold, Delphine Sicard, Daniel J Tschumperlin, Jennifer J Westendorf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Poisson's Ratio of Glasses, Ceramics, and Crystals.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine M ArnoldMayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-9036
Delphine SicardDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1062-6205
Daniel J TschumperlinDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Jennifer J WestendorfDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-6108
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Phlpp phosphatases in osteoarthritisR01AR078552 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WESTENDORF, JENNIFER J · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR078552NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical properties of biological tissues influence their function and can predict degenerative conditions before gross histological or physiological changes are detectable. This is especially true for structural tissues such as articular cartilage, which has a primarily mechanical function that declines after injury and in the early stages of osteoarthritis. While atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to test the elastic modulus of articular cartilage before, there is no agreement or consistency in methodologies reported. For murine articular cartilage, methods differ in two major ways: experimental parameter selection and sample preparation. Experimental parameters that affect AFM results include indentation force and cantilever stiffness; these are dependent on the tip, sample, and instrument used. The aim of this project was to optimize these experimental parameters to measure murine articular cartilage elastic modulus by AFM micro-indentation. We first investigated the effects of experimental parameters on a control material, polydimethylsiloxane gel (PDMS), which has an elastic modulus on the same order of magnitude as articular cartilage. Experimental parameters were narrowed on this control material, and then finalized on wildtype C57BL/6J murine articular cartilage samples that were prepared with a novel technique that allows for cryosectioning of epiphyseal segments of articular cartilage and long bones without decalcification. This technique facilitates precise localization of AFM measurements on the murine articular cartilage matrix and eliminates the need to separate cartilage from underlying bone tissues, which can be challenging in murine bones because of their small size. Together, the new sample preparation method and optimized experimental parameters provide a reliable standard operating procedure to measure microscale variations in the elastic modulus of murine articular cartilage.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularOsteoarthritisAnimalsBone and BonesElastic ModulusMiceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceAFMarticular cartilagechondrocytescryosectioningosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID36850434
PMCPMC9967621
OpenAlexW4319440548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.