Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850400›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Support for the Vulnerability Management Process Using Conversion CVSS Base Score 2.0 to 3.x.

Maciej Roman Nowak, Michał Walkowski, Sławomir Sujecki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maciej Roman NowakDepartment of Telecommunications and Teleinformatics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7747-4867
Michał WalkowskiDepartment of Telecommunications and Teleinformatics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4887-6098
Sławomir SujeckiDepartment of Telecommunications and Teleinformatics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4588-6741

Funding

Wrocław University of Science and Technology statutory activity
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 forced a number of changes in many areas of life, which resulted in an increase in human activity in cyberspace. Furthermore, the number of cyberattacks has increased. In such circumstances, detection, accurate prioritisation, and timely removal of critical vulnerabilities is of key importance for ensuring the security of various organisations. One of the most-commonly used vulnerability assessment standards is the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), which allows for assessing the degree of vulnerability criticality on a scale from 0 to 10. Unfortunately, not all detected vulnerabilities have defined CVSS base scores, or if they do, they are not always expressed using the latest standard (CVSS 3.x). In this work, we propose using machine learning algorithms to convert the CVSS vector from Version 2.0 to 3.x. We discuss in detail the individual steps of the conversion procedure, starting from data acquisition using vulnerability databases and Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms, to the vector mapping process based on the optimisation of ML algorithm parameters, and finally, the application of machine learning to calculate the CVSS 3.x vector components. The calculated example results showed the effectiveness of the proposed method for the conversion of the CVSS 2.0 vector to the CVSS 3.x standard.

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingCVSS standardmachine learningsecurity of IT systems

Identifiers

PMID36850400
PMCPMC9960370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.