Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850394›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluation of Electric Muscle Stimulation Method for Haptic Augmented Reality.

Takaya Ishimaru, Satoshi Saga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takaya IshimaruDepartment of Advanced Industrial Science, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto City 860-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-8228
Satoshi SagaFaculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto City 860-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6531-7055

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research) 19K22879JST SPRING (Kumamoto University Cross-disciplinary Doctoral Human Resource Development Program to Lead the Well-being Society) JPMJSP2127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, visual Augmented Reality (AR) technology is widespread among the public. Similarly, haptic AR technology is also widely practiced in the academic field. However, conventional haptic AR devices are not suitable for interacting with real objects. These devices are often held by the users, and they contact the real object via the devices. Thus, they prevent direct contact between the user and real objects. To solve this problem, we proposed employing Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) technology. EMS technology does not interfere with the interaction between the user and the real object, and the user can wear the device. First, we examined proper stimulus waveforms for EMS, in addition to pulse waveforms. At the same time, we examined the appropriate frequency and pulse width. The waveforms that we used this time were a sawtooth wave, a reverse sawtooth wave, and a sine wave. Second, to clarify the characteristic of the force presented by the EMS, we measured the relationship between the input voltage and the force presented and obtained the point of subjective equality using the constant method. Subsequently, we presented the bump sensation using EMS to the participants and verified its effectiveness by comparing it with the existing methods.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityHaptic TechnologyElectricityElectric StimulationHumansMuscleselectric muscle stimulationhaptic augmented realitywaveforms

Identifiers

PMID36850394
PMCPMC9965341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.