Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850334›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Promotion of In Vitro Osteogenic Activity by Melt Extrusion-Based PLLA/PCL/PHBV Scaffolds Enriched with Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Strontium Substituted Nano-Hydroxyapatite.

Georgia-Ioanna Kontogianni, Amedeo Franco Bonatti, Carmelo De Maria, Raasti Naseem, Priscila Melo, Catarina Coelho, Giovanni Vozzi, Kenneth Dalgarno, Paulo Quadros, Chiara Vitale-Brovarone and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgia-Ioanna KontogianniDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Amedeo Franco BonattiResearch Center E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-5135
Carmelo De MariaResearch Center E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-3571
Raasti NaseemSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-4370
Priscila MeloSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Catarina CoelhoFLUIDINOVA S.A., 4475-188 Maia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7049-8030
Giovanni VozziResearch Center E. Piaggio and Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-9994
Kenneth DalgarnoSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Paulo QuadrosFLUIDINOVA S.A., 4475-188 Maia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-1110
Chiara Vitale-BrovaroneDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.
Maria ChatzinikolaidouDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-2506
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Crete · GRPolitecnico di Torino · IT

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 814410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome the limitations of current treatments for bone-related disorders, but the trade-off between mechanical properties and bioactivity remains a concern for many polymeric materials. To address this need, novel polymeric blends of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) have been explored. Blend filaments comprising PLLA/PCL/PHBV at a ratio of 90/5/5 wt% have been prepared using twin-screw extrusion. The PLLA/PCL/PHBV blends were enriched with nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HA) and strontium-substituted nano-HA (Sr-nano-HA) to produce composite filaments. Three-dimensional scaffolds were printed by fused deposition modelling from PLLA/PCL/PHBV blend and composite filaments and evaluated mechanically and biologically for their capacity to support bone formation in vitro. The composite scaffolds had a mean porosity of 40%, mean pores of 800 µm, and an average compressive modulus of 32 MPa. Polymer blend and enriched scaffolds supported cell attachment and proliferation. The alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium production were significantly higher in composite scaffolds compared to the blends. These findings demonstrate that thermoplastic polyesters (PLLA and PCL) can be combined with polymers produced via a bacterial route (PHBV) to produce polymer blends with excellent biocompatibility, providing additional options for polymer blend optimization. The enrichment of the blend with nano-HA and Sr-nano-HA powders enhanced the osteogenic potential in vitro.

Indexed as

3D printingbone tissue engineeringcomposite scaffoldsextrusionfused deposition modeling (FDM)PCLPHBVPLLA

Identifiers

PMID36850334
PMCPMC9964080
OpenAlexW4321373399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.