Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850265›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Online Prediction of Molded Part Quality in the Injection Molding Process Using High-Resolution Time Series.

Lucas Bogedale, Stephan Doerfel, Alexander Schrodt, Hans-Peter Heim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas BogedaleFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Materials Engineering-Plastics, University of Kassel, 34125 Kassel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9741-8045
Stephan DoerfelFaculty of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Data Science, Kiel University of Applied Sciences, 24149 Kiel, Germany.
Alexander SchrodtInstitute of Physics, Functional Thin Films and Physics with Syncrotron Radiation, University of Kassel, 34127 Kassel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-5974
Hans-Peter HeimFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Materials Engineering-Plastics, University of Kassel, 34125 Kassel, Germany.

Funding

LOEWE - Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung Wissenschaftlich-ökonomischer Exzellenz, Förderlinie 3: KMU-Verbundvorhaben (State Offensive for the Development of Scientific and Economic Excellence) 864/20-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process-data-supported process monitoring in injection molding plays an important role in compensating for disturbances in the process. Until now, scalar process data from machine controls have been used to predict part quality. In this paper, we investigated the feasibility of incorporating time series of sensor measurements directly as features for machine learning models, as a suitable method of improving the online prediction of part quality. We present a comparison of several state-of-the-art algorithms, using extensive and realistic data sets. Our comparison demonstrates that time series data allow significantly better predictions of part quality than scalar data alone. In future studies, and in production-use cases, such time series should be taken into account in online quality prediction for injection molding.

Indexed as

injection moldingonline part quality predictionprocess monitoringtime series

Identifiers

PMID36850265
PMCPMC9959070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.