Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36850131›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Energy Consumption vs. Tensile Strength of Poly[methyl methacrylate] in Material Extrusion 3D Printing: The Impact of Six Control Settings.

Nectarios Vidakis, Markos Petousis, Nikolaos Mountakis, Amalia Moutsopoulou, Emmanuel Karapidakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nectarios VidakisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.
Markos PetousisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-7898
Nikolaos MountakisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-8753
Amalia MoutsopoulouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.
Emmanuel KarapidakisElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3589-0627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The energy efficiency of material extrusion additive manufacturing has a significant impact on the economics and environmental footprint of the process. Control parameters that ensure 3D-printed functional products of premium quality and mechanical strength are an established market-driven requirement. To accomplish multiple objectives is challenging, especially for multi-purpose industrial polymers, such as the Poly[methyl methacrylate]. The current paper explores the contribution of six generic control factors (infill density, raster deposition angle, nozzle temperature, print speed, layer thickness, and bed temperature) to the energy performance of Poly[methyl methacrylate] over its mechanical performance. A five-level L25 Taguchi orthogonal array was composed, with five replicas, involving 135 experiments. The 3D printing time and the electrical consumption were documented with the stopwatch approach. The tensile strength, modulus, and toughness were experimentally obtained. The raster deposition angle and the printing speed were the first and second most influential control parameters on tensile strength. Layer thickness and printing speed were the corresponding ones for the energy consumption. Quadratic regression model equations for each response metric over the six control parameters were compiled and validated. Thus, the best compromise between energy efficiency and mechanical strength is achievable, and a tool creates significant value for engineering applications.

Indexed as

compressive strengthenergy consumptionenergy efficiencymaterial extrusion (MEX)optimizationPoly[methyl methacrylate] (PMMA)robust designtaguchi analysis

Identifiers

PMID36850131
PMCPMC9966017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.