ReviewBMC psychiatry2023
A retrospective study of pharmacological treatment in anorexia nervosa: 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
Review in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Trajectories Associated with Pharmacological Treatment Patterns in Female Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa: A 12-Month Retrospective Study in Italian Real-World Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Overlooked and undertreated: gendered ageism in primary care management of eating disorders.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of anorexia nervosa - novel targets to break a vicious cycle.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2024Review
- Psychopharmacology Review for Eating Disorders Among Children, Adolescents, and Adults.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024Review
- The Impact of Clinical Factors, Vitamin B12 and Total Cholesterol on Severity of Anorexia Nervosa: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious and potentially life-threatening eating disorder characterized by starvation and malnutrition, a high prevalence of coexisting psychiatric conditions, marked treatment resistance, frequent medical complications, and a substantial risk of death. Body mass index (BMI) is a key measure of treatment outcome of AN and it is necessary to evaluate the long-term prognosis of AN. This study aimed to better assess the BMI course trend between different medications and timepoints in order to improve AN treatment in clinical practice.
methodsDuring the period 2010-2021, we retrospectively reviewed historical data of all patients diagnosed with AN. There were two groups in this study, which were based on the duration of follow-up. Group A was a 6-month follow-up group, comprising 93 patients (mean age 19.6 ± 6.8 years), with BMI assessed at three consecutive time points: first outpatient visit (T0), three months follow-up (T3), and six months follow-up (T6). Group B was a 12-month follow-up group comprising 36 patients (mean age 17.0 ± 5.2 years) with BMI assessed at five consecutive time points: first outpatient visit (T0), three months follow-up (T3), six months follow-up (T6), nine months follow-up (T9), and twelve months follow-up (T12). In our study, we retrospectively compared BMI courses based on patients' usage of medication using the following variables: single medication, switching medications, combined medications, and without medications. The primary outcome measurement was BMI recorded at the 6-month follow-up and the 12-month follow-up respectively. In our study, which was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, we reviewed outpatient medical records of all patients with AN who were seen at the hospital during the period 2010-2021.
resultsIn Group A (6-month follow-up), patients treated with antidepressants showed a mean BMI increase of 1.3 (p < 0.001); patients treated with antipsychotics showed a mean BMI increase of 1.1 (p = 0.01); patients treated with switching medications showed a mean BMI increase of 0.1 (p = 0.397); patients treated with combined medications showed a mean BMI increase of 0.5 (p = 0.208); and patients treated without medications showed a mean BMI increase of 0.1 (p = 0.821). The results indicated that patients with AN had a significant BMI increase after treatment with antidepressants and antipsychotics in the 6-month follow-up group. In Group B (12-month follow-up), patients treated with antidepressants showed a mean BMI increase of 2.7 (p < 0.001); patients treated with antipsychotics showed a mean BMI increase of 2.8 (p = 0.168); patients treated with switching medications showed a mean BMI decrease of 0.8 (p = 0.595); patients treated with combined medications showed a mean BMI increase of 1.6 (p = 0.368); and patients treated without medications showed a mean BMI increase of 1.0 (p = 0.262). The results indicated that patients with AN had a significant BMI increase after treatment with antidepressants at the 12-month follow-up.
conclusionsAN is a complex disease caused by multiple factors. Evaluating its long-term prognosis is crucial. Our study provides insights and highlights three key findings: 1) medication adherence is crucial in treating AN, 2) frequent switching of medications may not promote weight gain and may also require a re-establishment of rapport with patients with AN, and 3) pharmacotherapy, especially antidepressants, is more effective than no treatment. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.