ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
ncDENSE: a novel computational method based on a deep learning framework for non-coding RNAs family prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AWTI-Net Enables Accurate and Interpretable Functional Assessment of Disease-Associated LncRNA Mutations.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Noncoding RNA family classification based on multifeature fusion and convolutional block attention residual network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Improving ncRNA family prediction using multi-modal contrastive learning of sequence and structure.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Comparison and benchmark of deep learning methods for non-coding RNA classification.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Transformer Architecture and Attention Mechanisms in Genome Data Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.Biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough research on non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) is a hot topic in life sciences, the functions of numerous ncRNAs remain unclear. In recent years, researchers have found that ncRNAs of the same family have similar functions, therefore, it is important to accurately predict ncRNAs families to identify their functions. There are several methods available to solve the prediction problem of ncRNAs family, whose main ideas can be divided into two categories, including prediction based on the secondary structure features of ncRNAs, and prediction according to sequence features of ncRNAs. The first type of prediction method requires a complicated process and has a low accuracy in obtaining the secondary structure of ncRNAs, while the second type of method has a simple prediction process and a high accuracy, but there is still room for improvement. The existing methods for ncRNAs family prediction are associated with problems such as complicated prediction processes and low accuracy, in this regard, it is necessary to propose a new method to predict the ncRNAs family more perfectly.
resultsA deep learning model-based method, ncDENSE, was proposed in this study, which predicted ncRNAs families by extracting ncRNAs sequence features. The bases in ncRNAs sequences were encoded by one-hot coding and later fed into an ensemble deep learning model, which contained the dynamic bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU), the dense convolutional network (DenseNet), and the Attention Mechanism (AM). To be specific, dynamic Bi-GRU was used to extract contextual feature information and capture long-term dependencies of ncRNAs sequences. AM was employed to assign different weights to features extracted by Bi-GRU and focused the attention on information with greater weights. Whereas DenseNet was adopted to extract local feature information of ncRNAs sequences and classify them by the full connection layer. According to our results, the ncDENSE method improved the Accuracy, Sensitivity, Precision, F-score, and MCC by 2.08[Formula: see text], 2.33[Formula: see text], 2.14[Formula: see text], 2.16[Formula: see text], and 2.39[Formula: see text], respectively, compared with the suboptimal method.
conclusionsOverall, the ncDENSE method proposed in this paper extracts sequence features of ncRNAs by dynamic Bi-GRU and DenseNet and improves the accuracy in predicting ncRNAs family and other data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.