Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849883›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

The needs and opportunities for housing improvement for malaria control in southern Tanzania.

Ramadhani M Bofu, Ellen M Santos, Betwel J Msugupakulya, Najat F Kahamba, Joseph D Swilla, Rukiyah Njalambaha, Ann H Kelly, Javier Lezaun, Nicola Christofides, Fredros O Okumu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ramadhani M BofuDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania. rbofu@ihi.or.tz.
Ellen M SantosDepartment of Applied Health, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, USA.
Betwel J MsugupakulyaDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Najat F KahambaDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Joseph D SwillaSchool of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania.
Rukiyah NjalambahaDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Ann H KellyDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Javier LezaunInstitute for Science, Innovation, and Society, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nicola ChristofidesSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa.
Fredros O OkumuDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Marceline F FindaDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.

Funding

British Academy, 'Knowledge Frontier's scheme Grant Number: KF3/100047Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). Grant No. G-19-57145Ifakara Health Institute as part of the MSc studentship award Ref.# IHI/TC/BAG/2020/108Sida Grant No:54100113Uppsala Monitoring Center, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), and by the Wellcome Trust reference no. 107768/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria disproportionately affects low-income households in rural communities where poor housing is common. Despite evidence that well-constructed and mosquito-proofed houses can reduce malaria risk, housing improvement is rarely included in malaria control toolboxes. This study assessed the need, magnitude, and opportunities for housing improvement to control malaria in rural Tanzania.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted in 19 villages across four district councils in southern Tanzania. A structured survey was administered to 1292 community members to assess need, perceptions, and opportunities for housing improvement for malaria control. Direct observations of 802 houses and surrounding environments were done to identify the actual needs and opportunities, and to validate the survey findings. A market survey was done to assess availability and cost of resources and services necessary for mosquito-proofing homes. Focus group discussions were conducted with key stakeholders to explore insights on the potential and challenges of housing improvement as a malaria intervention.

resultsCompared to other methods for malaria control, housing improvement was among the best understood and most preferred by community members. Of the 735 survey respondents who needed housing improvements, a majority needed window screening (91.1%), repairs of holes in walls (79.4%), door covers (41.6%), closing of eave spaces (31.2%) and better roofs (19.0%). Community members invested significant efforts to improve their own homes against malaria and other dangers, but these efforts were often slow and delayed due to high costs and limited household incomes. Study participants suggested several mechanisms of support to improve their homes, including government loans and subsidies.

conclusionAddressing the need for housing improvement is a critical component of malaria control efforts in southern Tanzania. In this study, a majority of the community members surveyed needed modest modifications and had plans to work on those modifications. Without additional support, their efforts were however generally slow; households would take years to sufficiently mosquito-proof their houses. It is, therefore, crucial to bring together the key players across sectors to reduce barriers in malaria-proofing housing in endemic settings. These may include government subsidies or partnerships with businesses to make housing improvement more accessible and affordable to residents.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMalariaAnimalsCommerceHousingHumansTanzaniaHousing improvementMagnitudeMalaria controlNeedOpportunities

Identifiers

PMID36849883
PMCPMC9972788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.