ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2023
Utility of whole-exome sequencing for patients with multiple congenital anomalies with or without intellectual disability/developmental delay in East Asia population.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trifid epiglottis in a neonate with choanal atresia and hydrometrocolpos: the third reported case and the first symptomatic neonatal presentation.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Decoding the Genetic Enigma: A Case Study on Congenital Anomalies with Developmental Delay and 9q Duplication Unveiled Via Comprehensive Whole Exome Sequencing and Cytogenetic Analysis.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2026Article
- Trio Exome Sequencing in VACTERL Association.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Utility of whole-exome sequencing for patients with multiple congenital anomalies with or without intellectual disability/developmental delay in East Asia population.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital anomalies (CAs) with or without intellectual disability (ID)/developmental delay (DD) comprise a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases that affect approximately 3% of live births worldwide. Recently, whole-exome sequencing (WES) demonstrated the highly heterogeneous genetic causes of CAs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a referral system to increase the yield of WES for CAs.
methodsFrom August 2018 to July 2019, patients with CAs, with or without ID/DD, after excluding gross chromosomal aberrations, were referred to geneticists in two medical centers. Variant prioritization was conducted with an AI-assisted tool for whole exomes or a CA-related gene panel.
resultsForty patients (27 males and 13 females) with CAs were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 4.71 years (range, 0.01-18.2). Pathogenic variants in 14 genes were discovered in 16 patients (three patients with CHD7 and 13 patients with one gene each of ATP6V1B2, TAF6, COL4A3BP, ANKH, BMP2, SMARCA4, CUL4B, PGAP3, SOX11, FBN2, PTPN11, SOS1, or PROKR2), with a positive diagnostic rate of 40%. Among the 16 positive cases, 13 (81%) also had ID/DD. The inheritance was autosomal dominant in 13 (81%), autosomal recessive in two (13%), and X-linked in one (6%). Only five patients received a correct clinical diagnosis before WES. The analyses of patients with a negative genetic diagnosis revealed a phenotype and gene mutation load similar to those of the positive-finding patients but with a lower percentage of ID/DD.
conclusionsThe careful selection of patients by experienced geneticists and the exclusion of chromosomal aberrations raises the positive rate of the molecular diagnosis for CAs to 40%. However, more than half of the patients with CAs still do not have a genetic diagnosis by current technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.