Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Access to information and oncofertility consultation for young women with breast cancer: a population-based study.

Florian Martinet-Kosinski, Sébastien Lamy, Eric Bauvin, Florence Dalenc, Charlotte Vaysse, Pascale Grosclaude

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fertility in breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florian Martinet-KosinskiCERPOP UMR 1295, Paul Sabatier University Toulouse III, Inserm, Team Labelled By the French League Against Cancer, Toulouse, France. florian.martinet-kosinski@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3965-2391
Sébastien LamyCERPOP UMR 1295, Paul Sabatier University Toulouse III, Inserm, Team Labelled By the French League Against Cancer, Toulouse, France.
Eric BauvinCERPOP UMR 1295, Paul Sabatier University Toulouse III, Inserm, Team Labelled By the French League Against Cancer, Toulouse, France.
Florence DalencDepartment of Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT-O), Toulouse, France.
Charlotte VaysseDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse University Cancer Institute (IUCT-O), Paul Sabatier University Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Pascale GrosclaudeCERPOP UMR 1295, Paul Sabatier University Toulouse III, Inserm, Team Labelled By the French League Against Cancer, Toulouse, France.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-menopausal women with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy are at intermediate risk of post-treatment amenorrhea and decreased fertility. Although they should receive appropriate information, studies until now show that this is inadequate. We investigated the proportion of women who received information about this risk during the pre-treatment consultation, and those who received an oncofertility consultation to preserve their gametes. We also analysed the medical and non-medical factors influencing the transmission of information to patients and their uptake of oncofertility consultations. We included women aged 18-40 years treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer between 2012 and 2017 in the Midi-Pyrénées region (ca. 3 million inhabitants), France. Studied variables were included in a multilevel model. Among the 575 women, 41% of the women received information and 28% received an oncofertility consultation. These two steps on the care pathway were significantly influenced by the type of care structure, the woman's age, her parity at the time of diagnosis, and the metastatic status of the cancer. Female oncologist gender was significantly associated with higher transmission rate. We found no association between neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, level of deprivation (EDI), triple-negative status, marital status, and first-degree family history of cancer and information transmission or uptake of oncofertility consultation. Our study shows that not enough women are informed and have recourse to an oncofertility consultation. Despite a legal obligation, the health care system does not offer the necessary conditions for access to oncofertility care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFertility PreservationAccess to InformationFemaleHumansPregnancyReferral and ConsultationResearch

Identifiers

PMID36849808
PMCPMC9970981
OpenAlexW4322499902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.