ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Management of paraesophageal hiatus hernia: recommendations following a European expert Delphi consensus.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mesh versus no mesh reinforcement.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence mapping on how to perform an optimal surgical repair of large hiatal hernias.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- International expert consensus on the management of paraconduit herniation after esophagectomy: results of a two-round Delphi survey.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Reflections on surgery for hiatal hernia.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Modified laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication with vagus nerve sparing via total left-side approach for hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- The "ABCD" framework for assessment: a task-oriented approach to reconcile multimodal diagnostic discordance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Role of PhasixST™ Mesh in Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Surgical Technique and Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of crural reinforcement with bio-aHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Association Between Large Hernia Size and Severe Postoperative Complications After Type III/IV Hiatal Hernia Repair.Cureus · 2025Article
- Delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy: attempt at a clinically relevant classification.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025Article
- Article
- No advantage of fundoplication in paraesophageal hernia repair: a retrospective multicenter study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025Article
- PROsthetic MEsh Reinforcement in elective minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair (PROMER): an international survey.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Fundoplication: Old Concept for Novel Challenges?Visceral medicine · 2024Review
- Hot topics in Hiatal Hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Does crural repair with biosynthetic mesh improve outcomes of revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Observational
- Risk factors associated with radiological and clinical recurrences after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia with TiOHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Observational
- New Developments in Anti-Reflux Surgery: Where Are We Now?Visceral medicine · 2024Review
- Hiatal Hernias Revisited-A Systematic Review of Definitions, Classifications, and Applications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThere is considerable controversy regarding optimal management of patients with paraesophageal hiatus hernia (pHH). This survey aims at identifying recommended strategies for work-up, surgical therapy, and postoperative follow-up using Delphi methodology.
methodsWe conducted a 2-round, 33-question, web-based Delphi survey on perioperative management (preoperative work-up, surgical procedure and follow-up) of non-revisional, elective pHH among European surgeons with expertise in upper-GI. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Items from the questionnaire were defined as "recommended" or "discouraged" if positive or negative concordance among participants was > 75%. Items with lower concordance levels were labelled "acceptable" (neither recommended nor discouraged).
resultsSeventy-two surgeons with a median (IQR) experience of 23 (14-30) years from 17 European countries participated (response rate 60%). The annual median (IQR) individual and institutional caseload was 25 (15-36) and 40 (28-60) pHH-surgeries, respectively. After Delphi round 2, "recommended" strategies were defined for preoperative work-up (endoscopy), indication for surgery (typical symptoms and/or chronic anemia), surgical dissection (hernia sac dissection and resection, preservation of the vagal nerves, crural fascia and pleura, resection of retrocardial lipoma) and reconstruction (posterior crurorrhaphy with single stitches, lower esophageal sphincter augmentation (Nissen or Toupet), and postoperative follow-up (contrast radiography). In addition, we identified "discouraged" strategies for preoperative work-up (endosonography), and surgical reconstruction (crurorrhaphy with running sutures, tension-free hiatus repair with mesh only). In contrast, many items from the questionnaire including most details of mesh augmentation (indication, material, shape, placement, and fixation technique) were "acceptable".
conclusionsThis multinational European Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process to identify recommended strategies for the management of pHH. Our work may be useful in clinical practice to guide the diagnostic process, increase procedural consistency and standardization, and to foster collaborative research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.