Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849562›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Management of paraesophageal hiatus hernia: recommendations following a European expert Delphi consensus.

Stephan Gerdes, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Luigi Bonavina, Nicholas Boyle, Beat P Müller-Stich, Christian A Gutschow, Hiatus Hernia Delphi Collaborative Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of crural reinforcement with bio-aHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy: attempt at a clinically relevant classification.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. No advantage of fundoplication in paraesophageal hernia repair: a retrospective multicenter study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Hot topics in Hiatal Hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Stephan GerdesDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7327-609X
Sebastian F SchoppmannDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luigi BonavinaDivision of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Nicholas BoyleRefluxUK, London, UK.
Beat P Müller-StichDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian A GutschowDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. christian.gutschow@usz.ch.
Hiatus Hernia Delphi Collaborative Group
Aix-Marseille Université · FRAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDurham University · GBHelsinki University Hospital · FIHirslanden Klinik Beau-Site · CHInstituto Cajal · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEOslo University Hospital · NORadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Ulster · GBVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITZF Friedrichshafen (Germany) · DEB2 (Slovenia) · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThere is considerable controversy regarding optimal management of patients with paraesophageal hiatus hernia (pHH). This survey aims at identifying recommended strategies for work-up, surgical therapy, and postoperative follow-up using Delphi methodology.

methodsWe conducted a 2-round, 33-question, web-based Delphi survey on perioperative management (preoperative work-up, surgical procedure and follow-up) of non-revisional, elective pHH among European surgeons with expertise in upper-GI. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Items from the questionnaire were defined as "recommended" or "discouraged" if positive or negative concordance among participants was > 75%. Items with lower concordance levels were labelled "acceptable" (neither recommended nor discouraged).

resultsSeventy-two surgeons with a median (IQR) experience of 23 (14-30) years from 17 European countries participated (response rate 60%). The annual median (IQR) individual and institutional caseload was 25 (15-36) and 40 (28-60) pHH-surgeries, respectively. After Delphi round 2, "recommended" strategies were defined for preoperative work-up (endoscopy), indication for surgery (typical symptoms and/or chronic anemia), surgical dissection (hernia sac dissection and resection, preservation of the vagal nerves, crural fascia and pleura, resection of retrocardial lipoma) and reconstruction (posterior crurorrhaphy with single stitches, lower esophageal sphincter augmentation (Nissen or Toupet), and postoperative follow-up (contrast radiography). In addition, we identified "discouraged" strategies for preoperative work-up (endosonography), and surgical reconstruction (crurorrhaphy with running sutures, tension-free hiatus repair with mesh only). In contrast, many items from the questionnaire including most details of mesh augmentation (indication, material, shape, placement, and fixation technique) were "acceptable".

conclusionsThis multinational European Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process to identify recommended strategies for the management of pHH. Our work may be useful in clinical practice to guide the diagnostic process, increase procedural consistency and standardization, and to foster collaborative research.

Indexed as

Hernia, HiatalLaparoscopyDelphi TechniqueFundoplicationHerniorrhaphyHumansSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeDelphi surveyFundoplicationHiatus herniaMeshParaesophageal herniaSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID36849562
PMCPMC10234895
OpenAlexW4322491354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.