Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849549›Full record

ArticleNature methods2023

Self-supervised machine learning pushes the sensitivity limit in label-free detection of single proteins below 10 kDa.

Mahyar Dahmardeh, Houman Mirzaalian Dastjerdi, Hisham Mazal, Harald Köstler, Vahid Sandoghdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Label-Free Single-Molecule Immunoassay.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahyar Dahmardeh *Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8204-0652
Houman Mirzaalian Dastjerdi *Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-3158
Hisham MazalMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-9552
Harald KöstlerDepartment of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Vahid SandoghdarMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany. vahid.sandoghdar@mpl.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-4801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interferometric scattering (iSCAT) microscopy is a label-free optical method capable of detecting single proteins, localizing their binding positions with nanometer precision, and measuring their mass. In the ideal case, iSCAT is limited by shot noise such that collection of more photons should extend its detection sensitivity to biomolecules of arbitrarily low mass. However, a number of technical noise sources combined with speckle-like background fluctuations have restricted the detection limit in iSCAT. Here, we show that an unsupervised machine learning isolation forest algorithm for anomaly detection pushes the mass sensitivity limit by a factor of 4 to below 10 kDa. We implement this scheme both with a user-defined feature matrix and a self-supervised FastDVDNet and validate our results with correlative fluorescence images recorded in total internal reflection mode. Our work opens the door to optical investigations of small traces of biomolecules and disease markers such as α-synuclein, chemokines and cytokines.

Indexed as

MicroscopyPhotonsCytokinesSupervised Machine LearningCytokines

Identifiers

PMID36849549
PMCPMC9998267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.