Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Development of controlled nanosphere lithography technology.

Artem A Osipov, Alina E Gagaeva, Anastasiya B Speshilova, Ekaterina V Endiiarova, Polina G Bespalova, Armenak A Osipov, Ilya A Belyanov, Kirill S Tyurikov, Irina A Tyurikova, Sergey E Alexandrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Artem A OsipovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Alina E GagaevaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation. alina.gagaeva@mail.ru.
Anastasiya B SpeshilovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Ekaterina V EndiiarovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Polina G BespalovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Armenak A OsipovInstitute of Mineralogy of Southern-Urals Federal Research Center of Mineralogy and Geoecology of Ural Branch of RAS, Miass, Chelyabinsk Region, 456317, Russian Federation.
Ilya A BelyanovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Kirill S TyurikovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Irina A TyurikovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.
Sergey E AlexandrovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation.

Funding

Strategic academic leadership program 'Priority 2030' of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021-1333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work is devoted to the development of nanosphere lithography (NSL) technology, which is a low-cost and efficient method to form nanostructures for nanoelectronics, as well as optoelectronic, plasmonic and photovoltaic applications. Creating a nanosphere mask by spin-coating is a promising, but not sufficiently studied method, requiring a large experimental base for different sizes of nanospheres. So, in this work, we investigated the influence of the technological parameters of NSL by spin-coating on the substrate coverage area by a monolayer of nanospheres with a diameter of 300 nm. It was found that the coverage area increases with decreasing spin speed and time, isopropyl and propylene glycol content, and with increasing the content of nanospheres in solution. Moreover, the process of controllably reducing the size of nanospheres in inductively coupled oxygen plasma was studied in detail. It was determined that increasing the oxygen flow rate from 9 to 15 sccm does not change the polystyrene etching rate, whereas changing the high-frequency power from 250 to 500 W increases the etching rate and allows us to control the decreasing diameter with high accuracy. Based on the experimental data, the optimal technological parameters of NSL were selected and the nanosphere mask on Si substrate was created with coverage area of 97.8% and process reproducibility of 98.6%. Subsequently reducing the nanosphere diameter lets us obtain nanoneedles of various sizes, which can be used in field emission cathodes. In this work, the reduction of nanosphere size, silicon etching, and removal of polystyrene residues occurred in unified continuous process of plasma etching without sample unloading to atmosphere.

Identifiers

PMID36849515
PMCPMC9971052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.