ArticleScientific reports2023
Re-analysis of publicly available methylomes using signal detection yields new information.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intragenic methylation repatterning is associated with alternative splicing and unique epigenetic phenotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Intragenic methylation repatterning is associated with alternative splicing and unique epigenetic phenotypes.Environmental epigenetics · 2026Article
- Short-Term High Light Stress Analysis Through Differential Methylation Identifies Root Architecture and Cell Size Responses.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Article
- Article
- Phenotypic plasticity for improved light harvesting, in tandem with methylome repatterning in reef-building corals.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cytosine methylation is an epigenetic mark that participates in regulation of gene expression and chromatin stability in plants. Advancements in whole genome sequencing technologies have enabled investigation of methylome dynamics under different conditions. However, the computational methods for analyzing bisulfite sequence data have not been unified. Contention remains in the correlation of differentially methylated positions with the investigated treatment and exclusion of noise, inherent to these stochastic datasets. The prevalent approaches apply Fisher's exact test, logistic, or beta regression, followed by an arbitrary cut-off for differences in methylation levels. A different strategy, the MethylIT pipeline, utilizes signal detection to determine cut-off based on a fitted generalized gamma probability distribution of methylation divergence. Re-analysis of publicly available BS-seq data from two epigenetic studies in Arabidopsis and applying MethylIT revealed additional, previously unreported results. Methylome repatterning in response to phosphate starvation was confirmed to be tissue-specific and included phosphate assimilation genes in addition to sulfate metabolism genes not implicated in the original study. During seed germination plants undergo major methylome reprogramming and use of MethylIT allowed us to identify stage-specific gene networks. We surmise from these comparative studies that robust methylome experiments must account for data stochasticity to achieve meaningful functional analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.