ReviewZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2023
Aberration correction in diagnostic ultrasound: A review of the prior field and current directions.
Review in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Wearable ultrasound: a review of core technologies and clinical applications in cardiovascular monitoring.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- High-uniformity miniaturized PMUT array with broadband and high-sensitivity for wearable ultrasound imaging.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Autofocusing: Common Midpoint Phase Error Optimization via Differentiable Beamforming.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Robust Deep Learning for Pulse-Echo Speed of Sound Imaging via Time-Shift Maps.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Gas Vesicles and Acoustic Protein Nanostructures in Molecular Ultrasound Nanomedicine: Translational Archetypes, Biomaterial Design, and Barriers to Clinical Realization.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Spatial Coherence-Based Sound Speed Estimation in Plane Wave Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics · 2026Article
- Labeled Numerical Phantom of Abdominal Wall for Wave-Physics-Based Ultrasound Imaging: Applications to Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics · 2026Article
- Clutter-Generating Phantom Material. Part II: Utilization in the Comparison of Conventional and Regularized Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Aberration correction-impact on image quality and chamber quantification in transthoracic echocardiography.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Spatial Ambiguity Correction in Coherence-Based Average Sound Speed Estimation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Clinical, Safety, and Engineering Perspectives on Wearable Ultrasound Technology: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Review
- Iterative Pulse-Echo Tomography for Ultrasonic Image Correction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigating pulse-echo sound speed estimation in breast ultrasound with deep learning.Ultrasonics · 2024Article
- Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Interleaved Photoacoustic and Ultrasound (PAUS) Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional ultrasound matrix imaging.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical ultrasound images are reconstructed with simplifying assumptions on wave propagation, with one of the most prominent assumptions being that the imaging medium is composed of a constant sound speed. When the assumption of a constant sound speed are violated, which is true in most in vivoor clinical imaging scenarios, distortion of the transmitted and received ultrasound wavefronts appear and degrade the image quality. This distortion is known as aberration, and the techniques used to correct for the distortion are known as aberration correction techniques. Several models have been proposed to understand and correct for aberration. In this review paper, aberration and aberration correction are explored from the early models and correction techniques, including the near-field phase screen model and its associated correction techniques such as nearest-neighbor cross-correlation, to more recent models and correction techniques that incorporate spatially varying aberration and diffractive effects, such as models and techniques that rely on the estimation of the sound speed distribution in the imaging medium. In addition to historical models, future directions of ultrasound aberration correction are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.