Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849166›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

Facilitators and barriers to atrial fibrillation screening in primary care: a qualitative descriptive study of GPs in primary care in the Republic of Ireland.

Aileen Callanan, Farshid Bayat, Diarmuid Quinlan, Patricia M Kearney, Claire M Buckley, Susan M Smith, Colin P Bradley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Key stakeholder views on atrial fibrillation screening: a systematic mixed-studies review and interpretive analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Screening and detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care: current practice and future perspectives.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aileen CallananSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland aileen.callanan@ucc.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-6486
Farshid BayatSchool of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Diarmuid QuinlanIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Patricia M KearneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-3540
Claire M BuckleySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Susan M SmithDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-2727
Colin P BradleyDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-9567
University College Cork · IETrinity College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is a major risk factor for stroke. AF is often asymptomatic, making it difficult to diagnose. Globally, stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Opportunistic AF screening has been recommended in clinical practice within the Republic of Ireland (RoI) and internationally, though the optimal mode and location remains under investigation. Currently, there is no formal AF screening programme. Primary care has been proposed as a suitable setting.

aimTo identify the facilitators and barriers to AF screening in primary care from the perspective of GPs. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative descriptive study design was adopted. Fifty-four GPs were invited from 25 practices in the RoI to participate in individual interviews at their practices. Participants were from both rural and urban locations.

methodA topic guide was developed to guide the interview content towards identification of facilitators and barriers to AF screening. The interviews were conducted in person, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using framework analysis.

resultsEight GPs from five practices participated in an interview. Three GPs, two male and one female, were recruited from two rural practices and five GPs, two male and three female, were recruited from three urban practices. All eight GPs expressed a willingness to engage in AF screening. Time pressures and the need for additional staff to support were identified as barriers. Programme structure and patient awareness campaigns and education were identified as facilitators.

conclusionThe findings will help to anticipate barriers to AF screening and aid the development of clinical pathways for people with or at risk of AF. The results have been integrated into a pilot primary care-based screening programme for AF.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationprimary health carequalitative researchscreening

Identifiers

PMID36849166
PMCPMC10354396
OpenAlexW4322504594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.