ArticleClinical endoscopy2023
Defining the optimal technique for endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography: a combined benchtop and animal model study with comparison to transabdominal shear wave elastography.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- EUS-Guided Shear Wave Elastography in a Real-World Cohort: Diagnostic Accuracy and the Impact of Measurement Variability.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- EUS-Guided Shear-Wave-Based Elastography: Current Evidence and the Emerging Role of Two-Dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided strain and shear wave elastography for pancreatic and liver diseases.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Advances in endoscopic ultrasound-guided shear wave elastography: A comprehensive review of its clinical applications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Assessment of Intra-Individual Variability and Reproducibility in Pancreatic EUS-Guided Elastography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-based Shear Wave Elastography for Detection of Advanced Liver Disease.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2025Article
- EUS-based shear wave elastography of the spleen for detection of clinically significant portal hypertension.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024Article
- Advancements and challenges in gastrointestinal imaging.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Shear Wave Elastography in Pancreatic Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Standardization of endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsShear wave elastography (SWE) is used for liver fibrosis staging based on stiffness measurements. It can be performed using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or a transabdominal approach. Transabdominal accuracy can be limited in patients with obesity because of the thick abdomen. Theoretically, EUS-SWE overcomes this limitation by internally assessing the liver. We aimed to define the optimal technique for EUS-SWE for future research and clinical use and compare its accuracy with that of transabdominal SWE.
methodsBenchtop study: A standardized phantom model was used. The compared variables included the region of interest (ROI) size, depth, and orientation and transducer pressure. Porcine study: Phantom models with varying stiffness values were surgically implanted between the hepatic lobes.
resultsFor EUS-SWE, a larger ROI size of 1.5 cm and a smaller ROI depth of 1 cm demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy. For transabdominal SWE, the ROI size was nonadjustable, and the optimal ROI depth ranged from 2 to 4 cm. The transducer pressure and ROI orientation did not significantly affect the accuracy. There were no significant differences in the accuracy between transabdominal SWE and EUS-SWE in the animal model. The variability among the operators was more pronounced for the higher stiffness values. Small lesion measurements were accurate only when the ROI was entirely situated within the lesion.
conclusionWe defined the optimal viewing windows for EUS-SWE and transabdominal SWE. The accuracy was comparable in the non-obese porcine model. EUS-SWE may have a higher utility for evaluating small lesions than transabdominal SWE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.