Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849098›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy2023

Evaluation of an immunochromatography-based rapid antigen test, Inspecter Kowa® SARS-CoV-2, using saliva specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Masahiro Kodana, Yuta Orihara, Mariko Tezuka, Rina Takahashi, Sakiko Noguchi, Nanako Matsuzaki, Tomohito Takada, Naomi Kobari, Kana Ogane, Rieko Kawamura and 20 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahiro KodanaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan. Electronic address: m_kodana@saitama-med.ac.jp.
Yuta OriharaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Mariko TezukaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Rina TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Sakiko NoguchiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Nanako MatsuzakiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Tomohito TakadaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Naomi KobariDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Kana OganeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Rieko KawamuraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Toru KawamuraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Shinichi TakeuchiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yuki KamiyamaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Rie ShiomiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Ryutaro AoyagiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Masaya SaitoDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Takeru KusanoDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Nobuaki NakayaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Satoru KanekoDepartment of Nephrology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hideo MoritaDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshihito UchidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroaki YazawaDepartment of Rheumatology and Applied Immunology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Ryu SekiyaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Kazuki KatayamaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Shingo MikamiDepartment of Neurology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Tomoya SatoDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Norihito TarumotoDepartment of Infectious Disease and Infection Control, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Takehito KobayashiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hidetomo NakamotoDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Takuya MaedaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Saitama Medical University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a rapid and reliable point-of-care test is an essential tool for controlling the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In particular, an immunochromatography test (ICT) that uses saliva specimens for rapid antigen detection not only reduces the risk of secondary infections but also reduces the burden on medical personnel.

methodsThe newly developed salivary antigen test kit "Inspecter Kowa® SARS-CoV-2" is an ICT to which saliva specimens can be directly applied. We evaluated its usefulness in comparison with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and the Espline® SARS-CoV-2 Kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using nasopharyngeal swab specimens. In this study, 140 patients with suspected symptomatic COVID-19 who visited our hospital were enrolled, and nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens were collected after they consented to participate in the study.

resultsInspector Kowa SARS-CoV-2 was positive in 45 of 61 (73.8%) saliva that were positive by RT-qPCR and the Espline® SARS-CoV-2 Kit was also positive in 56 of 60 (93.3%) Np swabs that were positive by RT-qPCR. Good antigen detection was achieved by ICT with saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens when viral load was ≥10

conclusionThis ICT for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 salivary antigen is an attractive tool that does not require specialized equipment and allows patients to perform the entire process from sample collection to self-diagnose and to reduce the burden on medical care during a pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Clinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingHumansNasopharynxSalivaSpecimen HandlingAntigen detectionCOVID-19ImmunochromatographySalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36849098
PMCPMC9968476
OpenAlexW4322153975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.