Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36848569›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

A gender perspective on the global migration of scholars.

Xinyi Zhao, Aliakbar Akbaritabar, Ridhi Kashyap, Emilio Zagheni

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global subnational estimates of migration of scientists reveal large disparities in internal and international flows.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinyi ZhaoDepartment of Digital and Computational Demography, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock 18057, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2552-7795
Aliakbar AkbaritabarDepartment of Digital and Computational Demography, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock 18057, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-1533
Ridhi KashyapLeverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0615-2868
Emilio ZagheniDepartment of Digital and Computational Demography, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock 18057, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although considerable progress toward gender equality in science has been made in recent decades, female researchers continue to face significant barriers in the academic labor market. International mobility has been increasingly recognized as a strategy for scientists to expand their professional networks, and that could help narrow the gender gap in academic careers. Using bibliometric data on over 33 million Scopus publications, we provide a global and dynamic view of gendered patterns of transnational scholarly mobility, as measured by volume, distance, diversity, and distribution, from 1998 to 2017. We find that, while female researchers continued to be underrepresented among internationally mobile researchers and migrate over shorter distances, this gender gap was narrowing at a faster rate than the gender gap in the population of general active researchers. Globally, the origin and destination countries of both female and male mobile researchers became increasingly diversified, which suggests that scholarly migration has become less skewed and more globalized. However, the range of origin and destination countries continued to be narrower for women than for men. While the United States remained the leading academic destination worldwide, the shares of both female and male scholarly inflows to that country declined from around 25% to 20% over the study period, partially due to the growing relevance of China. This study offers a cross-national measurement of gender inequality in global scholarly migration that is essential for promoting gender-equitable science policies and for monitoring the impact of such interventions.

Indexed as

BibliometricsPhysiciansChinaFemaleGender EquityHumansMaleResearch Personnelbibliometric datafeminization of global migrationgender gapglobal migration of scholarsscience of science

Identifiers

PMID36848569
PMCPMC10013742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.