Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36848555›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Cross-species predictive modeling reveals conserved drought responses between maize and sorghum.

Jeremy Pardo, Ching Man Wai, Maxwell Harman, Annie Nguyen, Karl A Kremling, Maria Cinta Romay, Nicholas Lepak, Taryn L Bauerle, Edward S Buckler, Addie M Thompson and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy PardoDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Ching Man WaiDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Maxwell HarmanDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-7814
Annie NguyenDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Karl A KremlingInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Maria Cinta RomayInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.ORCID 0000-0001-9309-1586
Nicholas LepakAgricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Taryn L BauerleSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.ORCID 0000-0003-2741-2593
Edward S BucklerInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-371X
Addie M ThompsonPlant Resilience Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-6578
Robert VanBurenDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-2760
Michigan State University · USCornell University · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

Plant Biotechnology for Health and SustainabilityT32GM110523 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LAST, ROBERT LOUIS · 2014 to 2023
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM110523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought tolerance is a highly complex trait controlled by numerous interconnected pathways with substantial variation within and across plant species. This complexity makes it difficult to distill individual genetic loci underlying tolerance, and to identify core or conserved drought-responsive pathways. Here, we collected drought physiology and gene expression datasets across diverse genotypes of the C4 cereals sorghum and maize and searched for signatures defining water-deficit responses. Differential gene expression identified few overlapping drought-associated genes across sorghum genotypes, but using a predictive modeling approach, we found a shared core drought response across development, genotype, and stress severity. Our model had similar robustness when applied to datasets in maize, reflecting a conserved drought response between sorghum and maize. The top predictors are enriched in functions associated with various abiotic stress-responsive pathways as well as core cellular functions. These conserved drought response genes were less likely to contain deleterious mutations than other gene sets, suggesting that core drought-responsive genes are under evolutionary and functional constraints. Our findings support a broad evolutionary conservation of drought responses in C4 grasses regardless of innate stress tolerance, which could have important implications for developing climate resilient cereals.

Indexed as

SorghumZea maysDroughtsEdible GrainPoaceaeC4 grassesdroughtmaizepredictive modelingtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36848555
PMCPMC10013860
OpenAlexW4322490049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.